Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Cisco and Tenable are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Cisco is ranked #22, while Tenable is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Cisco holds a 2.5% mindshare in RBVM, compared to Tenable’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Read 1 Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) review

1,135 Views
726 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Read 45 Tenable Vulnerability Management reviews

7,486 Views
2,770 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Tenable, Horizon3.ai and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cisco Security Portfolio (11th)

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (8th), Patch Management (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 7.5%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management	7.5%
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)	2.5%
Other	90.0%

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

AshishPaliwal

Self-employed at Self-employed

Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability

An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like this work if my company has already invested thousands or maybe millions in a GRC solution? Do I still need it and how does it fit into an existing SAP environment? There could be interoperability, having more data sources, integrating Splunk, Qualys, FireEye, Rapid7, Carbon Black. I'm sure all that can be done to an extent, with a little more insight and a little more accuracy on the industry numbers and trends. I'd like the solution to offer any sort of assistance in any way with the remediation part, not just identification of vulnerability risk, and that is second.

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."

"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature; that is what it is used for and then data from different sources can be fed into it, and they have good dashboards, risk meters, and virtualization."

"It has greatly impacted us by providing asset visibility."

"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."

"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."

"The solution creates vulnerability tickets within the VM profile but should also include them under the Remediation tab so the fixes can be viewed in the ticketing queue."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"

"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The solution's most valuable aspects are its user interface and usability."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."

"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."

"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."

"Technical support from Tenable is rated six out of ten. It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly."

"The one drawback that we have found is the reports. We are still getting reports from Tenable.sc since the maturity levels on the reports are lacking."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"The price could be lower, and the grouping of platforms on the dashboard can be included in the next release of the product."

"They need a better approach to support. When I have hard questions that need answers to, I prefer to jump to L3 support instead of getting pushed to L1."

"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness. They need to work on that aspect of the solution."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think that there is any very specific area where enhancements need to happen in Tenable Vulnerability Management's feature sets. The only area which possibly is not a part of the feature, b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vulcan Cyber vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 9% of the time

Brinqa vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) report

Download Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform

Tenable.io

Overview

Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

Prioritization is no longer a dark art—it's data science. Advanced algorithms, combined with rich internal and external intel, offer recommended fixes that will lower risk in as few moves as possible.

Track vulnerability fluctuations and forecast weaponization with up to 94% accuracy, giving you the chance to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities before bad actors can mount an attack.

With more than 19 threat intelligence feeds at your fingertips, you gain a comprehensive view of emerging threats, shifting trends, and your own risk profile.

A single source of data-verified truth aligns security and IT, eliminating friction and freeing up resources. And intuitive, simplified risk scores help you generate reports anyone can understand.

Cisco

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

TransUnion

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Tenable, Horizon3.ai and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.