Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Unified Vulnerability Management comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security
Sponsored
Average Rating
0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (65th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
Cisco Vulnerability Managem...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cisco Security Portfolio (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (18th)
Unified Vulnerability Manag...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (268th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (20th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Zafran Security?
Share your opinion
AshishPaliwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability
An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like this work if my company has already invested thousands or maybe millions in a GRC solution? Do I still need it and how does it fit into an existing SAP environment? There could be interoperability, having more data sources, integrating Splunk, Qualys, FireEye, Rapid7, Carbon Black. I'm sure all that can be done to an extent, with a little more insight and a little more accuracy on the industry numbers and trends. I'd like the solution to offer any sort of assistance in any way with the remediation part, not just identification of vulnerability risk, and that is second.
Use Unified Vulnerability Management?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
832,990 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Retailer
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform
Avalor
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
TransUnion
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: January 2025.
832,990 professionals have used our research since 2012.