Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudAlly vs Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudAlly
Ranking in Cloud Backup
46th
Ranking in SaaS Backup
22nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
MSP Backup (9th)
Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365
Ranking in Cloud Backup
6th
Ranking in SaaS Backup
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of CloudAlly is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is 6.3%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2586000 - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly interface enhances protection with room for better reporting
I use CloudAlly for what it's made for, which is backups The user-friendly interface of CloudAlly significantly enhances data protection. CloudAlly can improve in the areas of reporting, especially regarding backup statistics and backup failures presented in pie graphs and charts. I have used…
MehmetAksoy - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable rollback features for smooth IT operations and an easy setup
We are using Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 to take backups of shop floor PCs. I use it for clients locally, particularly for critical machines. It is also used globally for server-side backups and includes scheduling features like taking ten backups every Sunday when the factory is closed. This…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The user-friendly interface of CloudAlly significantly enhances data protection."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Its absolute functionality and intuitiveness are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the data backup functionality."
"The most critical feature of Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is its ability to back up and protect data on cloud services."
"It is very simple to set up."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the scalability and the free license of up to ten VMs."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"For data security, we rely on Veeam Backup for Teams and it is quite effective."
 

Cons

"CloudAlly can improve in the areas of reporting, especially regarding backup statistics and backup failures presented in pie graphs and charts."
"Pricing is an area for improvement, and I would rate it at five out of ten."
"In the next release, it should have direct export to tape drive abilities and NDMP support."
"They need more documentation, awareness, and assistance."
"It would be a great improvement to be able to recover cover a VM straight to on-prem."
"We would like to have a single management console for all of our backups."
"The product cannot back up Active Directory objects while its competitors can. Self-service power enables us to deal with service providers. We provide services for our clients, so having a multi-tenant service portal would be good."
"It would be beneficial to implement a mechanism that allows for more efficient input processing, such as recognizing the first capital letter of an email account."
"Veeam Backup for Office 365 can improve by adding more features with Microsoft teams. We have many files that we are working on with Microsoft teams and there should be more integration and features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing model makes this solution more expensive than it needs to be."
"The pricing is expensive."
"I think it's a fair price. It's around $36 per user, so I think it's a fair price for our customers."
"I'm not sure about the price, but I think it could be lower."
"We looked at a few cloud options. When we did the comparison, we found it to be a cost-effective solution, and it included everything."
"The pricing is middle-of-the-road compared with competing products."
"We are talking about a third party solution, so there is a licensing fee."
"Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Legal Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does AvePoint Cloud Backup compare with Veeam Backup for Office 365?
AvePoint Cloud Backup for MS Office 365 is a SaaS backup whose features include secure storage and unlimited and automated backups. The storage is saved in AvePoint’s Azure storage or it can also b...
What do you like most about Veeam Backup for Office 365?
The tool is easy to use and straightforward regarding restoration and creating backups. It's user-friendly, providing results and sending alerts when something goes wrong.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veeam Backup for Office 365?
The initial cost can be high as IT solutions are generally expensive, however, the solution is worth it due to its functionality and reliability. I would recommend revisiting the pricing structure,...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Veeam Backup for Office 365, Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Check out our customer success stories: https://www.cloudally.com/resources/customer-success-stories/ 
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudAlly vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.