CockroachDB vs Exasol Data Warehouse comparison

Cockroach and Exasol are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Exasol is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0. Cockroach holds a 3.7% mindshare in SQL, compared to Exasol’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exasol users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,677 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Exasol Data Warehouse

Read 8 Exasol Data Warehouse reviews

438 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Exasol Data Warehouse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

CockroachDB and Exasol Data Warehouse are competitive products in the database solutions category, each catering to different needs. CockroachDB seems to have the upper hand in distributed SQL databases, focusing on elasticity and high availability, while Exasol leads in high-performance analytics capabilities due to its speed and efficiency in processing complex queries.

Features: CockroachDB offers horizontal scalability, built-in resilience, and simplified management, making it ideal for distributed computing environments. It provides high fault-tolerance, low learning curve, and compatibility with PostgreSQL wire protocols. Exasol stands out for its analytic processing speed, automatic performance optimization, and ease of handling data-heavy applications. It includes features like automatic indexing and a user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: CockroachDB could enhance its query performance and provide better support for complex analytics. There is room to improve its geo-partitioning capabilities further. Users may encounter issues with poorly optimized queries if not fine-tuned properly. Exasol could improve initial setup simplicity, better handling of concurrent users, and offering more flexible pricing options for smaller deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CockroachDB enables seamless integration with cloud environments and provides well-structured documentation, which simplifies deployment. Its approachable support structure adds to its appeal for cloud-native applications. Exasol, while focused on high performance, may demand more specialized setup and expertise during integration, making it crucial to have strong support for a smooth transition.

Pricing and ROI: CockroachDB's lower setup costs and favorable licensing fees make it a cost-effective choice, offering fast ROI for businesses seeking cloud-native database solutions. Exasol requires a higher initial investment but promises significant returns for organizations heavily reliant on quick and responsive data analytics, though the recovery period might be slower.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Exasol Data Warehouse Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Exasol Data Warehouse

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Exasol Data Warehouse

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.7%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Exasol Data Warehouse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Fast query processing and easy-to-store all the data

There are very few companies that are using Exasol, but the majority of companies are using SQL Server, Cloud or IBM Db2 Database, or any other databases. Therefore, the resources are limited, which is my only concern. So if I face any issues, limited resources are available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol. From that perspective, it can be a bit of a struggle for me to find a solution. In the next release, I would like to see better compatibility issues. Currently, Exasol has limited compatibility with other software like Python and R. For example, If I talk about SQL Server, we can connect it to big data or Python, which is also compatible with different servers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The product has valuable security features."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

More CockroachDB pros

"Its speed is great."

"We can quickly scale the solution as it works on an MPP system."

"We mainly chose Exasol for its performance reasons."

"The solution is hands-off; you set it up insert your data and it self tunes queries."

"The speed is very good compared to other databases, like SQL Server or Oracle."

"It is easy to scale."

"The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed."

"Performance is a top priority, and it excels in this aspect."

Cons

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

More CockroachDB cons

"There are limited resources available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol."

"They should improve the security features for MPP processing."

"They don't talk very well to with other products when it comes to connectivity. Integration is lacking."

"You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems."

"It's not cloud-native so many maintenance operations require downtime."

"The only area where we found it could improve was in custom role creation and security, and it was difficult to work with."

"It would be beneficial if the updates would occur more often."

"Lacks a cloud-based platform."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...

See all answers

What do you like most about Exasol?

The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exasol?

You have to use upper-column names in Exasol, which is strange. You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Exasol?

We implemented our data problem issues from Tableau. We inserted the data into the Exasol database in order to run 10 to 20 reports from Tableau. This was just a small but problematic report for us.

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 20% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

SAP HANA vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 52% of the time

SQL Server vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 48% of the time

More Exasol Data Warehouse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

April 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse

April 2025

Download Exasol Data Warehouse product report

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

Exasol is a high-performance data warehouse solution that accelerates BI and reporting features. Its speed, stability, and self-tuning queries make it valuable, and it doesn't require a database administrator. It's a backend database for Tableau dashboards, resulting in faster report loading times and increased efficiency in querying data.

Exasol's high performance allows users to connect insights and fire queries instead of looking at cached dashboards. It has impressive aggregation capabilities that help calculate metrics on the fly based on user-selected filters.

Exasol

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

1&1 Internet SE 11880 Internet Services AG AB Svenska Spel Accarda AG Aera Technology Inc. AGRAVIS Raiffeisen AG Apotheken-Rechen-Zentrum GmbH AQR Capital Management, LLC arvato distribution GmbH ARZ Allgemeines Rechenzentrum GmbH Badoo Limited Baur Versand (GmbH & Co. KG) BIScience Ltd Blocket Blue Yonder GmbH Codilink UK Ltd T/A Coniq crealytics GmbH dailyme TV GmbH Dailymotion S.A. Dataforce Verlagsgesellschaft für Business Information mbH Deutsche Postbank AG Digitales Rezept Zentrum GmbH DIKW Groep direct services Gütersloh GmbH DR Technologies Ltd. dress-for-less GmbH econda GmbH emetriq GmbH empiriecom GmbH & Co. KG Flaconi GmbH Fresenius Netcare GmbH Fyber GmbH GfK SE Grant Street Group, Inc. Gruner + Jahr GmbH Gymshark UK Hahn Air Lines GmbH Hermes Einrichtungs Service GmbH & Co. KG INNOVATIVE SCHEDULING, LLC internetstores GmbH INTERSPORT Deutschland eG IQVIA Commercial GmbH & Co. OHG IQVIA Commercial Sp. z o.o. IQVIA Incorporated iVantage Health Analytics K - Mail Order GmbH & Co. KG LIQ CORP SA Manor AG Basel Match2Lists Limited MEDION AG Midasplayer AB Monsoon Accessorize Limited m-pathy GmbH msales Ltd. MTG Modern Services AB MW Aviation GmbH & Co. KG Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd Netzeffekt GmbH New Company Services Ltd. NOVENTI HealthCare GmbH Olympus Europa SE & Co. KG Operation Fistula OpsDataStore OTTO (GmbH & Co KG) Panda Retail Co. PAPSTAR GmbH Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. Questback GmbH RatePAY GmbH Revolut Ltd. Saarland-Sporttoto GmbH Sagarmatha Ltd. SIA Damara Technologies Supermärkte Nord Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG The National Research Center for College & University Admissions, Inc. United Utilities Water Ltd. Verlag C.H. Beck oHG Vocal Planet Ltd. Vodafone Group Services GmbH Webtrekk GmbH wer liefert was? GmbH Windeln.de SE Wooga GmbH XING SE Zalando SE

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Exasol Data Warehouse

April 2025

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. Exasol Data Warehouse

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Exasol Data Warehouse and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. Exasol Data Warehouse report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.