Top 10 Exasol Data Warehouse Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Exasol Data Warehouse Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Exasol Data Warehouse based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SQL Server, MySQL, and Teradata. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Exasol Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Exasol, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SQL Server

4.2 out of 5

SQL Server

4.2 out of 5

SQL Server offers strong integration with Microsoft products and cost-efficient solutions. In comparison, Exasol Data Warehouse excels in performance and flexibility, providing advanced analytics. SQL Server suits Microsoft-centric environments, while Exasol attracts those needing high-speed analytics and deployment flexibility.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. SQL Server Report

Pricing

SQL Server has a lower setup cost compared to the pricier setup of Exasol Data Warehouse, highlighting notable cost differences between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

SQL Server has a lower setup cost compared to the pricier setup of Exasol Data Warehouse, highlighting notable cost differences between the two solutions.

MySQL

4.1 out of 5

MySQL

4.1 out of 5

MySQL provides reliability and ease of use with a cost-effective setup. In comparison, Exasol excels in high-speed analytics and scalability, offering advanced analytics capabilities. MySQL's affordability attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Exasol appeals to those prioritizing powerful performance and long-term value.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL Report

Pricing

MySQL offers a simple setup with competitive costs, while Exasol Data Warehouse has a straightforward setup process but may involve higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

MySQL offers a simple setup with competitive costs, while Exasol Data Warehouse has a straightforward setup process but may involve higher initial expenses.

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata emphasizes scalability and robust integration, beneficial for complex analytics in large enterprises. In comparison, Exasol is distinguished by its rapid in-memory processing, appealing to businesses seeking efficient speed and performance, despite potentially higher costs.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. Teradata Report

Pricing

Teradata's setup cost is significantly higher compared to Exasol Data Warehouse. Exasol offers a lower initial expense, making it a more affordable option in terms of setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Teradata's setup cost is significantly higher compared to Exasol Data Warehouse. Exasol offers a lower initial expense, making it a more affordable option in terms of setup.

Oracle Database

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database excels in comprehensive data integration and security, supporting various workloads with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Exasol focuses on in-memory analytics and fast, scalable architecture, making it ideal for businesses requiring quick insights from large data sets.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database Report

Pricing

Oracle Database has a higher setup cost compared to Exasol Data Warehouse, making Exasol a more affordable option for initial installation. These differences highlight cost as a significant factor in deciding between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP HANA

4.1 out of 5

SAP HANA

4.1 out of 5

SAP HANA excels in real-time analytics and app integration for high-speed transactions. In comparison, Exasol stands out with performance speed and scalability for data-intensive environments. SAP HANA's complex setup is countered by Exasol's straightforward deployment, ideal for buyers seeking simplicity.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. SAP HANA Report

Pricing

SAP HANA has a high setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Exasol Data Warehouse offers a more cost-effective setup, providing a budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP HANA has a high setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Exasol Data Warehouse offers a more cost-effective setup, providing a budget-friendly option.

IBM Db2 Database

4.1 out of 5

IBM Db2 Database

4.1 out of 5

IBM Db2 offers advanced security and AI integration, making it ideal for enterprises seeking an integrated data solution. In comparison, Exasol focuses on speed and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing fast querying and advanced analytics capabilities.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. IBM Db2 Database Report

Pricing

IBM Db2 Database involves a higher setup cost, while Exasol Data Warehouse provides a more cost-effective installation.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Db2 Database involves a higher setup cost, while Exasol Data Warehouse provides a more cost-effective installation.

Oracle Database In-Memory

4.4 out of 5

Oracle Database In-Memory

4.4 out of 5

Oracle Database In-Memory excels in real-time analytics within the Oracle ecosystem, offering superior transactional speed. In comparison, Exasol Data Warehouse is ideal for advanced analytical processing with its scalability and cost-effective model, making it attractive for data-driven decision-making.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database In-Memory Report

Pricing

Oracle Database In-Memory's setup cost can be higher due to its infrastructure requirements, while Exasol Data Warehouse offers a more cost-effective setup with streamlined deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Database In-Memory's setup cost can be higher due to its infrastructure requirements, while Exasol Data Warehouse offers a more cost-effective setup with streamlined deployment.

Related categories

Relational Databases Tools

Open Source Databases

Customer Experience Management