CodeSonar vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

CodeSecure and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. CodeSecure holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,002 Views
1,280 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 4 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

164 Views
104 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and CodeSonar cater to cybersecurity and software analysis respectively. Spirent CyberFlood stands out for its favorable pricing and support, while CodeSonar is favored for its feature-rich capabilities justifying the cost.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers realistic attack emulation, comprehensive traffic simulation, and robust security assessments. CodeSonar provides extensive static analysis, supports numerous programming languages, and offers deep insights into code weaknesses.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could benefit from enhanced reporting, expanded protocol support, and improved functional features. CodeSonar seeks better performance, especially with larger codebases, and could improve handling efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood provides a straightforward deployment process and a responsive customer service. CodeSonar's deployment may be more challenging, but customer support is acknowledged for its technical prowess.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is perceived as cost-effective with solid ROI due to lower setup costs and resource efficiency. CodeSonar's higher initial setup costs are offset by long-term benefits, delivering high ROI through its effective security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (5th)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Oct 31, 2022

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Haider Jarral

Lead Technologist | Strategic Alliance | Business Development at Illumio

May 4, 2023

I like the solution's flexibility

I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing CyberFlood is flexible. Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"It has been able to scale."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

Cons

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"It was expensive."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?

CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?

The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CodeSonar?

Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar

Compared 60% of the time

Coverity vs CodeSonar

Compared 18% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 8% of the time

Klocwork vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 70% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 30% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Learn More

CodeSecure

Spirent

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood

October 2024

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.