Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CodeSonar vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

CodeSecure and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. CodeSecure holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.
CodeSonar
Read 7 CodeSonar reviews
  • 2,002 Views
  • 1,280 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Spirent CyberFlood
Read 4 Spirent CyberFlood reviews
  • 164 Views
  • 104 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and CodeSonar cater to cybersecurity and software analysis respectively. Spirent CyberFlood stands out for its favorable pricing and support, while CodeSonar is favored for its feature-rich capabilities justifying the cost.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers realistic attack emulation, comprehensive traffic simulation, and robust security assessments. CodeSonar provides extensive static analysis, supports numerous programming languages, and offers deep insights into code weaknesses.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could benefit from enhanced reporting, expanded protocol support, and improved functional features. CodeSonar seeks better performance, especially with larger codebases, and could improve handling efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood provides a straightforward deployment process and a responsive customer service. CodeSonar's deployment may be more challenging, but customer support is acknowledged for its technical prowess.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is perceived as cost-effective with solid ROI due to lower setup costs and resource efficiency. CodeSonar's higher initial setup costs are offset by long-term benefits, delivering high ROI through its effective security solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,562 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.4
CodeSonar's support team is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and excellent service, often rated four to five stars.
No sentiment score available
Spirent CyberFlood's customer service is praised for its local team, providing effective support with a satisfaction rating of 7/10.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
CodeSonar needs improved architecture scanning, language support, security features, flexible licensing, and easier setup to compete with Polyspace.
Sentiment score
6.5
Spirent CyberFlood needs improved port availability, speed, storage, frequent updates, language options, browser support, and error reporting.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CodeSonar is praised for scalability, performing well across projects, and organizations report no issues scaling its usage.
Sentiment score
5.0
Spirent CyberFlood is viewed as scalable but limited in expandability, reflecting diverse user experiences and satisfaction levels.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.5
CodeSonar is expensive but valued for reliability and ease of use, with costs over $100,000 annually for large projects.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CodeSonar is highly stable and dependable, consistently receiving high ratings for its reliability and crash-free performance.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
CodeSonar effectively detects memory leaks, runtime errors, and security threats, ensuring code stability with its user-friendly interface.
Sentiment score
7.5
Spirent CyberFlood offers a user-friendly traffic generator and flexible network monitoring tools, ideal for adaptable, efficient solutions.
 

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar
Ranking in Application Security Tools
20th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Static Code Analysis (5th)
Spirent CyberFlood
Ranking in Application Security Tools
35th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY - PeerSpot reviewer
Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand
This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.
Read full review
Haider Jarral - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's flexibility
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?
CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?
The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CodeSonar?
Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?
CyberFlood is flexible.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar
Compared 61% of the time
Coverity vs CodeSonar Logo
Coverity vs CodeSonar
Compared 18% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar
Compared 8% of the time
Klocwork vs CodeSonar Logo
Klocwork vs CodeSonar
Compared 4% of the time
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar Logo
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar
Compared 3% of the time
More CodeSonar Competitors
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 72% of the time
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 28% of the time
More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
CodeSonar reportDownload CodeSonar product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Spirent CyberFlood reportDownload Spirent CyberFlood product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Learn More

CodeSecure
Spirent
 

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

 

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY
Digicel
Buyer's Guide
CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood
October 2024
Free Report: CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood
Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.