CodeSonar vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

CodeSecure and Sonar are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. CodeSecure holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Sonar’s 26.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

1,969 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 113 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

40,107 Views
32,629 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

SonarQube Server and CodeSonar compete in the code analysis software category. SonarQube seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive language support and community-driven development process.

Features: SonarQube offers comprehensive code analysis with support for over 20 programming languages, pre-commit checks, custom coding rules, and quality gates. It integrates well with different platforms and tools, making it a versatile choice for software quality management. CodeSonar is known for rapid analysis, precise issue detection, and features that focus on security threats and runtime errors, such as dead code detection and buffer overflow analysis. Its intuitive user interface helps maintain high coding standards.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube needs to enhance its false positive reduction capabilities and expand its programming language support to include more diverse integrations. The increased analysis time in newer versions presents challenges for complex projects. CodeSonar could improve by expanding language support beyond C and C++ and refining its static analysis accuracy. Simplifying configuration and addressing cost concerns could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers flexible deployment across on-premises, private, public, and hybrid cloud setups, supported by an active open-source community, though support quality varies with package levels. CodeSonar focuses on public and private cloud options with limited on-premises capabilities, targeting organizations needing robust security solutions, though its high cost can deter smaller teams.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube is available in a Community edition for free and offers paid versions with additional plugins and support. Its flexible pricing suits both small projects and large enterprises, emphasizing cost-efficiency through open-source input. CodeSonar, while reliable and valuable for security threat detection, is perceived as costly compared to other tools, suggesting a need to review its pricing strategy to increase adoption.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (7th)

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 26.7%, down from 27.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

The product provides false reports sometimes. It also fails to understand the context of the code. It reports that a line of code has issues without considering its relation with the previous line. The product should improve the report quality. While it asks us to improve the code quality, it would be good if it also suggests how to improve the quality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"It has been able to scale."

"I like that it's easy to navigate not just in terms of code findings but you can actually see them in the context of your source code because it gives you a copy of your code with the items that it found and highlights them. You can see it directly in your code, so you can easily go back and make the corrections in the code. It basically finds the problems for you and tells you where they are."

"SonarQube is one of the more popular solutions because it supports 29 languages."

"The most valuable features are the wide array of languages, multiple languages per project, the breakdown of bugs, and the description of vulnerabilities and code smells (best practices)."

"The most valuable features are the analysis and detection of issues within the application code."

"I like the by-default policies that are they, as they seem to cover most of what I need."

"The solution has a wide variety of features and an open-source community that you are able to learn Java, JavaScript, or any other programing language."

"The most valuable features are the dashboard reports and the ease of integrating it with Jenkins."

"We use this solution for qualitative coding. We make use of the SonarLint plugin as well as the dashboard."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"It was expensive."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"If there was an official Docker image of SonarQube that could easily integrate into the pipeline would help the user to plug in and plug out and use it directly without any custom configuration. I am not sure if this is being offered already in an update but it would be very helpful."

"There are times that we have the database crash. However, this might be an issue with how we have configured it and not a software issue. Apart from this, I do not see any issues with the solution."

"There is no automation. You need to put the code there and test. You then pull the results and put them back in the development environment. There is no integration with the development environment. We would like it to be integrated with our development environment, which is basically the CI/CD pipeline or the IDE that we have."

"The solution could improve the management reports by making them easier to understand for the technical team that needs to review them."

"New plug-ins should be integrated into SonarCloud to give more flexibility to the product."

"The scanning part could be improved in SonarQube. We have used Coverity for scanning, and we have the critical issues reported by Coverity. When we used SonarQube for scanning and looked at the results, it seems that some of them have incorrect input. This part can be improved for C and C++ languages."

"In the next release, I would like to have notifications because now, it is a bit difficult. I think that's a feature which we could add there and it would benefit the users as well. For every full request, they should be able to see their bugs or vulnerability directly on the surface."

"I think the code security can be improved."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"This product is open source and very convenient."

"The developer edition is based on cost per lines of code."

"I was using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."

"A low cost long-term solution for non-critical situations."

"SonarQube is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."

"It is very expensive. Its price should be improved."

"We use the free version; there are no hidden costs or licensing required."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?

CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?

The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CodeSonar?

Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Coverity vs CodeSonar

Compared 18% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 8% of the time

Klocwork vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

Semgrep vs CodeSonar

Compared 2% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 16% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Klocwork vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 2% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

December 2024

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

November 2024

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sonar

Learn More

CodeSecure

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

CodeSecure

Sonar

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

December 2024

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.