Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CodeSonar vs Klocwork comparison

CodeSecure and Perforce are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8, while Perforce is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5. CodeSecure holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Perforce’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Perforce users who would recommend it.
CodeSonar
Read 7 CodeSonar reviews
  • 2,002 Views
  • 1,280 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Klocwork
Read 20 Klocwork reviews
  • 3,108 Views
  • 1,864 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Klocwork and CodeSonar are leading tools in static code analysis. Based on user reviews, CodeSonar is preferred for its extensive features and justified pricing, even though Klocwork is favored for its competitive pricing and support.

Features: Klocwork supports multiple programming languages, integrates easily with existing systems, and is recognized for comprehensive language support. CodeSonar provides thorough analysis, has high accuracy in detecting potential vulnerabilities, and offers superior detection abilities.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork could improve in processing speed, reduce false positives, and enhance performance. CodeSonar needs a more intuitive configuration process, improved documentation, and simplified user interaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork has an easy deployment process, but users desire more proactive customer service. CodeSonar's complex deployment is balanced by responsive support, providing effective guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork provides competitive setup costs and reasonable ROI based on integration needs. CodeSonar's higher cost is balanced by a comprehensive feature set and detailed analysis, making it a justified investment for thorough code evaluation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
CodeSonar vs. Klocwork
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.4
CodeSonar's support team is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and excellent service, often rated four to five stars.
Sentiment score
5.0
Klocwork offers highly rated, proactive technical support with quick issue resolution, available in over thirty countries.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
CodeSonar needs improved architecture scanning, language support, security features, flexible licensing, and easier setup to compete with Polyspace.
Sentiment score
4.9
Klocwork faces performance, language support, and usability issues, causing false warnings, slow updates, and limited Agile tool integration.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CodeSonar is praised for scalability, performing well across projects, and organizations report no issues scaling its usage.
Sentiment score
7.2
Klocwork demonstrates excellent scalability and adaptability for teams of all sizes, integrating well with various infrastructures and tools.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.5
CodeSonar is expensive but valued for reliability and ease of use, with costs over $100,000 annually for large projects.
Sentiment score
8.5
Klocwork provides flexible licensing and competitive pricing, justified by its capabilities, suitable for both small and large organizations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CodeSonar is highly stable and dependable, consistently receiving high ratings for its reliability and crash-free performance.
Sentiment score
8.6
Klocwork is praised for stability and reliability, despite performance updates and network-related connectivity issues some users experience.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
CodeSonar effectively detects memory leaks, runtime errors, and security threats, ensuring code stability with its user-friendly interface.
Sentiment score
8.2
Klocwork enhances software quality with static code analysis, integrating smoothly with CI and IDEs for efficient defect detection.
 

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar
Ranking in Application Security Tools
20th
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Klocwork
Ranking in Application Security Tools
23rd
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY - PeerSpot reviewer
Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand
This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.
Read full review
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws
What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Educational Organization
40%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?
CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?
The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CodeSonar?
Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Klocwork?
It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?
Our purchasing department is responsible for tracking costs. It's one of the most widely used tools in our organization. It likely does not have a high price point. I don't have insights into licen...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Klocwork?
The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze. It will show all poss...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar
Compared 61% of the time
Coverity vs CodeSonar Logo
Coverity vs CodeSonar
Compared 18% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar
Compared 8% of the time
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar Logo
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar
Compared 3% of the time
Semgrep vs CodeSonar Logo
Semgrep vs CodeSonar
Compared 3% of the time
More CodeSonar Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork
Compared 39% of the time
Coverity vs Klocwork Logo
Coverity vs Klocwork
Compared 32% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork
Compared 11% of the time
Checkmarx One vs Klocwork Logo
Checkmarx One vs Klocwork
Compared 4% of the time
Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork Logo
Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork
Compared 3% of the time
More Klocwork Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
CodeSonar reportDownload CodeSonar product report
Buyer's Guide
Klocwork
November 2024
Klocwork reportDownload Klocwork product report
 

Learn More

CodeSecure
Perforce
 

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

 

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY
ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
Buyer's Guide
CodeSonar vs. Klocwork
October 2024
Free Report: CodeSonar vs. Klocwork
Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CodeSonar vs. Klocwork report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.