Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CodeSonar vs WhiteHat Dynamic comparison

The compared CodeSecure and Black Duck solutions aren't in the same category. CodeSecure is ranked #20 in AS , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 1.2% mindshare in the category. Black Duck is ranked #6 in DAST , and holds a 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.
CodeSonar
Read 7 CodeSonar reviews
  • 2,002 Views
  • 1,280 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
WhiteHat Dynamic
Read 2 WhiteHat Dynamic reviews
  • 152 Views
  • 118 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CodeSonar and WhiteHat Dynamic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,636 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.4
CodeSonar's support team is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and excellent service, often rated four to five stars.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
CodeSonar needs improved architecture scanning, language support, security features, flexible licensing, and easier setup to compete with Polyspace.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CodeSonar is praised for scalability, performing well across projects, and organizations report no issues scaling its usage.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.5
CodeSonar is expensive but valued for reliability and ease of use, with costs over $100,000 annually for large projects.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CodeSonar is highly stable and dependable, consistently receiving high ratings for its reliability and crash-free performance.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
CodeSonar effectively detects memory leaks, runtime errors, and security threats, ensuring code stability with its user-friendly interface.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (20th), Static Code Analysis (5th)
WhiteHat Dynamic
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

CodeSonar and WhiteHat Dynamic aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CodeSonar is designed for Application Security Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
WhiteHat Dynamic, on the other hand, focuses on Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), holds 6.5% mindshare, up 5.2% since last year.
Application Security Tools
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY - PeerSpot reviewer
Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand
This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.
Read full review
it_user245412 - PeerSpot reviewer
The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.
* The continuous online scanning capabilities and reporting features. * The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy. * The ability to review security items quickly along with being able to retest vulnerabilities on our schedule make the Sentinel product an invaluable tool for our company’s product security requirements.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?
CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?
The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CodeSonar?
Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar
Compared 61% of the time
Coverity vs CodeSonar Logo
Coverity vs CodeSonar
Compared 18% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar
Compared 8% of the time
Klocwork vs CodeSonar Logo
Klocwork vs CodeSonar
Compared 4% of the time
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar Logo
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar
Compared 3% of the time
More CodeSonar Competitors
Veracode vs WhiteHat Dynamic Logo
Veracode vs WhiteHat Dynamic
Compared 18% of the time
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs WhiteHat Dynamic Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs WhiteHat Dynamic
Compared 17% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs WhiteHat Dynamic Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs WhiteHat Dynamic
Compared 17% of the time
Invicti vs WhiteHat Dynamic Logo
Invicti vs WhiteHat Dynamic
Compared 16% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs WhiteHat Dynamic Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs WhiteHat Dynamic
Compared 14% of the time
More WhiteHat Dynamic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
CodeSonar reportDownload CodeSonar product report
Buyer's Guide
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
October 2024
WhiteHat Dynamic reportDownload WhiteHat Dynamic product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic
 

Learn More

CodeSecure
Black Duck
 

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Continuous Dynamic™ is a powerful dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution that rapidly and accurately finds vulnerabilities in websites and applications. With this DAST solution, you can perform scans and testing at the scale and speed modern enterprises need to identify security risks across your entire application portfolio.

 

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.