Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cohesity Data Cloud vs Quorum OnQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Cohesity Data Cloud users reported cost savings, time efficiency, enhanced security, scalability, and improved ROI through simplified data management and reduced downtime.
Sentiment score
7.9
Quorum OnQ ensures continuous business operations, quick data recovery, hardware cost savings, and IT time efficiency.
If I find myself stuck in a cyber recovery situation, this tool can help me avoid spending my money on ransom payments.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.2
Cohesity Data Cloud offers responsive customer service with efficient support, though legacy system support requires improvement for full satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.3
Quorum OnQ's tech support is responsive and knowledgeable, offering superior, personalized service despite occasional peak time delays.
issues with Cohesity Data Cloud have not been encountered, suggesting a robust service.
Sometimes I face delays, which can be frustrating.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Cohesity Data Cloud offers scalable, efficient data handling with significant ROI, but faces some scalability challenges despite operational benefits.
Sentiment score
7.3
Quorum OnQ provides scalable disaster recovery solutions for medium to large enterprises, with flexibility for varying infrastructure needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Users appreciate Cohesity Data Cloud for its stability, robust performance, seamless integration, high availability, and reliable operation.
Sentiment score
8.4
Quorum OnQ is praised for its reliability, minimal downtime, easy updates, and effective support, ensuring user satisfaction.
 

Room For Improvement

Cohesity Data Cloud needs updates in documentation, multi-tenancy, and features, alongside simplifying setup and enhancing cost-effectiveness.
Quorum OnQ needs better disaster recovery, cloud integration, NAS support, user interface, pricing, email notifications, and hardware support.
The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth.
The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions.
The URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs.
 

Setup Cost

Cohesity Data Cloud's higher cost is justified by strong security, compliance, and ransomware protection despite requiring additional hardware.
Quorum OnQ's pricing is cost-effective for enterprises despite high initial costs due to integrated support and value recovery features.
Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes.
There is an additional cost for infrastructure, which I need to provide.
It's a little expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Cohesity Data Cloud simplifies backup management with scalable, integrated solutions, offering disaster recovery, ransomware protection, and responsive support.
Quorum OnQ offers quick recovery, user-friendly management, strong security, fast backups, and cost-effectiveness, enhancing its overall appeal.
It replicates data to the cloud in a tamper-proof manner, offering protection against ransomware attacks since it is not under administrative control.
They have a feature called DataSock, which enhances data protection.
Quorum OnQ provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity Data Cloud
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
40th
Ranking in Cloud Backup
34th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)
Quorum OnQ
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
46th
Ranking in Cloud Backup
33rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quorum OnQ is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

AmarpreetSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI
The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.
Mohamed Iqbal - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and economical solution that provides quick disaster recovery
The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery. We call it a single-click recovery. If any server goes down, crashes, or experiences downtime, we can bring up the DR (Disaster Recovery) server in just two minutes. We also have a "Single Pane of Glass," wherein we work with only a single window. You don't have to use multiple windows to perform basic tasks like failover or failback.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?
While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...
What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?
The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...
What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?
The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?
It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.
What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?
They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments wit...
 

Also Known As

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios
OnQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto
LCL Bulk Transport
Find out what your peers are saying about Cohesity Data Cloud vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.