Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Collibra Catalog vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.8
Informatica TDM is scalable, supporting both horizontal and vertical expansion, efficiently handling large databases with minimal tuning required.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Informatica TDM excels with data masking, dynamic features, strong engines, and effective data discovery through RegEx and automated workflows.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
Informatica Test Data Management is generally stable and reliable, though some users experience occasional instability and minor issues.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.2
Informatica Test Data Management must improve data masking, transformations, UI, compatibility, integration, and address user experience and performance issues.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.9
Informatica Test Data Management's customer service is praised for excellence, though some users report global support challenges.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.4
Users recommend subscription or short-term rental for Informatica TDM due to project suitability and high upfront licensing costs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Collibra Catalog
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Metadata Management (4th)
Informatica Test Data Manag...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Test Data Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Collibra Catalog and Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Collibra Catalog is designed for Metadata Management and holds a mindshare of 11.2%, up 8.6% compared to last year.
Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), on the other hand, focuses on Test Data Management, holds 17.8% mindshare, up 15.3% since last year.
Metadata Management
Test Data Management
 

Featured Reviews

Aditya Pawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective for data discovery and supports multiple authentication methods, not just username and password
For data discovery, we create datasets. The most frequently used datasets are featured on the dashboard. Users can create their own if their requirements aren't met by the most frequently used datasets. We also create data requests, and owners can approve these requests, which adds a process layer to accessing particular datasets. So, it has been effective for data discovery in our company. I use different functionalities within the tool. I use Collibra Catalog for metadata management or Collibra Lineage for data governance. Once configured, data in the Catalog will be automatically updated, reducing the need for manual maintenance. So, the automation feature has positively impacted our data management tasks.
Mukul Shukla - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient test data management with good automation and speeds up processes
I face multiple issues, but these are not due to a lack of functionality in the product but rather its inherent complexity. There is a lag while opening the console, which is a concern from my end. Additionally, the logs are not always clear, and sometimes, accessing the PowerCenter server becomes necessary to identify errors.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

AM
Dec 2, 2021
Dec 2, 2021
Depending on your requirement you would want to select the right tool to achieve your requirement based on the suggestions below. 1. Data Discovery and Obfuscation with Classification you would need a tool that is capable of handling referential integrity ensuring that when a data is Identified as PII (Personally Identifiable Information) is obfuscated correctly e.g. If Jim is Obfuscated to Jac...
See 2 answers
Ronald D'Souza - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 1, 2021
Depending on your requirement you would want to select the right tool to achieve your requirement based on the suggestions below. 1. Data Discovery and Obfuscation with Classification you would need a tool that is capable of handling referential integrity ensuring that when a data is Identified as PII (Personally Identifiable Information) is obfuscated correctly e.g. If Jim is Obfuscated to Jack then any relatable references of Jim is always masked as Jack. Cross Reference mapping is a key in Test Data Management that deals with taking data from Production and making it available in Non-Prod sanitizing the data to have meaningful information but not identifiable information.  Once the data rules for sanitization are defined applying the data rules in the most efficient way will be another criteria to consider. You would not want your data not to be available during the process of obfuscation or have a DB performance issue. You should also consider capabilities like continuality in case your obfuscation process fails midway  you would want to continue from the last updated record (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relational databases and flat files, Collibra for structured and some unstructured data source) 2. How often will my data be refreshed, If it is very often then you would want to subset the data to only include changes in your refresh as the obfuscation process is resource-intensive and could lead to performance degradation on a continuous refresh of a large database.  (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relational databases and flat files, Collibra for structured and some unstructured data source) 3. How often does my database need restore for testing and how often would you get conflict due to multiple tests running on the same environment. You would want to consider virtualizing the data like Virtual Machine to prevent regular restore and having a quick checkpoint to roll to once testing is completed and also giving the capability to the tester to have their own test environment (Broadcom Test Data Manager for a relational database). 4. Is data generation your requirement, do you need to add missing data or generate data for a newly developed system. Would you want to generate data that meet negative and positive test case scenarios? E.g. Getting a valid Social Security number that is usable but has no actual entity to be identified to, Generating a Visa card dummy number that will pass visa validation but is not a valid card (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relational databases and flat files) 5. Data Discovery would also be a good to have feature, like the capability to scan data and column in your data source and identify information that could be PII data - (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relation databases, Collibra for structured and some unstructured data source) 6. Classification of the databased on discovery and risk of the data in the data source (Informatica Test Data Manager support, Broadcom Test Data Manager support, Collibra supports) 7. How diverse is my data sources. does my data reside on the same database or multiple databases, are the relationship that exists across databases and are all the databases supported by the tool.  8. Do data only reside in the database or in a Flat file, will the tool be capable of providing test data management to flat-file like CSV, XML and so on. 
CF
Dec 2, 2021
With just those few requirements, I'd opt for a simpler tool such as the one by dScribe from a cataloging point of view.  If validation of the actual data is a requirement then the most complete offering today is Collibra's.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Collibra Catalog?
The data lineage capability is valuable as it shows how different sources are connected and how data flows, which is crucial for projects like migrations. Moreover, data lineage visualization in C...
What needs improvement with Collibra Catalog?
I'd like to see more integration with other reporting sources like Qlik Sense, beyond the currently supported ones like Tableau and Power BI.
What do you like most about Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
The tool enabled us to leverage Teradata Parallel Transporter to write the masked data efficiently to our Teradata warehouse.
What needs improvement with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
I face multiple issues, but these are not due to a lack of functionality in the product but rather its inherent complexity. There is a lag while opening the console, which is a concern from my end....
What is your primary use case for Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
I am an administrator for the Informatica Test Data Management solution. My team uses it to generate test data, create dummy data, replicate production data by masking it, and use it within the QA ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Informatica TDM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive
Vale, Hot Telecommunication
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Alation, SAP and others in Metadata Management. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.