Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Comindware and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Comindware is ranked #41, while IBM is ranked #39. Comindware holds a 0.1% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Comindware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Comindware Tracker
Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews
  • 122 Views
  • 49 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 4 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 119 Views
  • 68 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Comindware Tracker are competing in business process management solutions. IBM stands out in complex integrations, while Comindware is favored for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers advanced business process modeling, robust integration, and sophisticated analytics. Comindware Tracker is notable for its flexibility, seamless workflow automation, and easy customization without extensive coding.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and offer more affordable licensing options. Comindware Tracker can enhance analytics capabilities, provide more enterprise-level integration features, and improve scalability for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker offers quick deployment with its cloud-based solution and is recognized for intuitive support. IBM WebSphere BPMS requires longer deployment due to complex configurations but provides extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires a higher initial investment, suitable for large-scale implementations with substantial ROI. Comindware Tracker is competitively priced, offering a lower initial cost with faster ROI through its flexible pricing structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Process Automation
41st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (50th)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
39th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

NS
Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop
Comindware is great for workflow management. It's user-friendly and trustworthy. You don't need technical skills to develop, maintain and update workflows. Using the intuitive web-based user interface of the visual workflow builder, you can design and set up workflows. Comindware Tracker is a good…
Read full review
reviewer1145748 - PeerSpot reviewer
Can easily trace where a path has gone but tasks fail without a reason
We have contacted their customer support a few times. They are very technical. When writing the logs we are redirected to the correct support team. Before engaging the support team, we did our own research. IBM has its own website knowledge base. There are times that we are not confident to perform those steps ourselves because the impact will be huge because production will be down for a few days. There are times when we have had a few steps that we needed to troubleshoot with the support team. The onsite support requires additional charges. It depends on the severity of the ticket.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"​It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.​"
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day.​"
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
More Comindware Tracker pros
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
 

Cons

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
More Comindware Tracker cons
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is so reasonable."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"Great value for the money."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
66%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker
February 2025
Comindware Tracker reportDownload Comindware Tracker product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
February 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

  • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
  • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
  • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
  • Unified Document and Data Management
  • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
  • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


Comindware
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
January 2025
Free Report: Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.