Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Comindware and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Comindware is ranked #41, while IBM is ranked #38. Comindware holds a 0.1% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Comindware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Comindware Tracker
Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews
  • 118 Views
  • 41 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 133 Views
  • 67 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Comindware Tracker are competing in business process management solutions. IBM stands out in complex integrations, while Comindware is favored for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers advanced business process modeling, robust integration, and sophisticated analytics. Comindware Tracker is notable for its flexibility, seamless workflow automation, and easy customization without extensive coding.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and offer more affordable licensing options. Comindware Tracker can enhance analytics capabilities, provide more enterprise-level integration features, and improve scalability for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker offers quick deployment with its cloud-based solution and is recognized for intuitive support. IBM WebSphere BPMS requires longer deployment due to complex configurations but provides extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires a higher initial investment, suitable for large-scale implementations with substantial ROI. Comindware Tracker is competitively priced, offering a lower initial cost with faster ROI through its flexible pricing structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Process Automation
41st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (51st)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
38th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

NS
Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop
Comindware is great for workflow management. It's user-friendly and trustworthy. You don't need technical skills to develop, maintain and update workflows. Using the intuitive web-based user interface of the visual workflow builder, you can design and set up workflows. Comindware Tracker is a good…
Read full review
ST
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"Low code development."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"​It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.​"
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
More Comindware Tracker pros
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
 

Cons

"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
More Comindware Tracker cons
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Great value for the money."
"The price is so reasonable."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker
March 2025
Comindware Tracker reportDownload Comindware Tracker product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
March 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

  • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
  • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
  • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
  • Unified Document and Data Management
  • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
  • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


Comindware
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
March 2025
Free Report: Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.