Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
47th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (40th)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
24th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

clientac994590 - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiency has improved with the standardization of our business processes
There are two key topics which could be improved in this product: * The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of digitalization and innovation. Structure of functionalities and general storyline/rational of the solution could be reviewed. * There are not many report templates to be used; the list of available templates could be improved and expanded. The solution should take advanced of advanced analytics to provide a rich and compelling set of dashboards with metrics and useful insights.
Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"​It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.​"
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
 

Cons

"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution has a very lost cost."
"Great value for the money."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"The price is so reasonable."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"It has a reasonable price."
"The solution has a very complex pricing model."
"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
"SharePoint uses a subscription model."
"On-premises version is expensive"
"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
66%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Legal Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.