ConformIQ Creator vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing comparison

Conformiq and Digital.ai are both solutions in the AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools category. Conformiq is ranked #23, while Digital.ai is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Conformiq holds a 0.4% mindshare in AIST, compared to Digital.ai’s 12.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Conformiq users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Digital.ai users who would recommend it.

ConformIQ Creator

Read 3 ConformIQ Creator reviews

0 Views
1 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

44 Views
32 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ConformIQ Creator

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ConformIQ Creator and Digital.ai Continuous Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ConformIQ Creator

Ranking in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (23rd), Test Design Automation (3rd)

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ConformIQ Creator is 0.4%. The mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 12.6%, up from 12.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1518657

QE Manager at Capgemini

Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team

The core functionality of the tool is automated test generation of optimized test suite; the tool has extensive list of options for the same. The product's integration with other tools sets it apart. It has integrations with many upstream (for requirements mapping) and downstream (export of test cases to various tools) products. It is like "plug-and-play". For any customized downstream tool, like our proprietary automation framework, support is provided for custom development. It is has features - Business AD - to use in Agile implementations. The latest version seems to have support for BDD/Gherkin as well, which we have not used much.

Read full review

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart."

"The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

Cons

"Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have."

"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow."

"It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

42%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

22%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ConformIQ Creator

Compared 55% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ConformIQ Creator

Compared 45% of the time

More ConformIQ Creator Competitors

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 60% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 40% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

March 2025

Download ConformIQ Creator product report

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

March 2025

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Also Known As

Conformiq Creator, Conformiq Transformer

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Overview

Conformiq Creator provides a solution for automating testing processes and speeding up the software development lifecycle of Enterprise IT applications. Conformiq Creator is used in various sectors, including Telecom, Banking, Finance, Insurance, Retail, and Public Sector services. Launched initially in 2013, Creator quickly gained popularity among its users for its functional testing, application testing, system testing, and end-to-end testing.

Conformiq Transformer shortens the path to test automation, simplifies model-based testing (MBT) adoption using existing methods, and automates manual test execution. Along with Conformiq Creator, which generates executable test cases, scripts and documentation from models, it automates and transforms test design, extending the Conformiq 360° Test Automation™ solution for complex system testing at the speed of development.

Conformiq

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Sample Customers

Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Daimler, Ericsson

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

March 2025

Free Report: ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing report.

See our list of best AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.