Control-M and SnapLogic both compete in the workflow automation and integration space. Control-M has the upper hand with its advanced integration capabilities and robust enterprise features.
Features: Control-M offers extensive integration capabilities across platforms, automated error handling, and modules that integrate with third-party applications to facilitate complex workflow scheduling. Its Control-M Virtual Terminal for AS400 targets banking systems, enhancing usability in this sector. SnapLogic provides a low-code environment and a wide range of connectors for seamless data pipeline creation, offering flexibility and easy-to-use tools for complex integrations without extensive coding requirements.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve flexibility in output analysis, expand reporting capabilities, and streamline its upgrade processes. Users desire better built-in reporting tools and more effective arithmetic operations during output analysis. SnapLogic needs enhancements in API monitoring and more transparency in data flows. Improved debugging features and better community support resources, along with more comprehensive documentation, are also needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M provides diverse deployment options, including on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, with strong technical support known for responsiveness and proficiency, though some coordination issues exist. SnapLogic is flexible in hybrid and public cloud setups and offers good technical support, but is less consistent with support experiences, and its community resources need enhancement for broader adoption.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M operates as a premium solution with task-based licensing, which can be expensive for smaller organizations. While its features justify the cost, the investment is significant. SnapLogic is more affordable with a usage-based pricing model, providing flexibility for complex and simple tasks, though costs can increase with high usage. Its competitive pricing delivers good ROI by streamlining integration processes.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
SnapLogic is really helpful and processes in very little time, so it doesn't take much time compared to any legacy tool.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten.
Some SMEs are allotted for the organization, so in case of any issue, we have their email IDs to contact them for support, including SMEs and community.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
I rate the scalability of SnapLogic as eight out of ten.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Once properly implemented, the system becomes very stable, which is one of its strongest attributes.
I would rate the stability of SnapLogic as nearly ten out of ten.
But recently, in a year, I haven't found many performance issues in SnapLogic.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial.
They can improve more visuals, with graphical representations, such as how many things can be added, how many users can be added or dropped, and how the back-end nodes can be graphically shown in a better way.
I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower.
SnapLogic is positioned at around seven or eight out of ten in terms of pricing.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
I also like the whole child-parent pipeline feature; it allows me to break up a process into smaller pieces and then have one big pipeline that controls these smaller pipelines.
I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL.
It's moving into AI, so we can create AI agents with LLM models. We can use most of the LLM such as Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Azure AI.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Control-M | 4.6% |
SnapLogic | 0.6% |
Other | 94.8% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 24 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 113 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 11 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.