Coralogix vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

Coralogix and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,527 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

74 Views
22 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Coralogix and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are leading products in their fields with distinct strengths and considerations. Coralogix leads in user satisfaction concerning pricing and support, but Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management offers superior features that users believe justify the cost.

Features: Coralogix leads in log management, real-time analytics, and ease of integrations. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive monitoring, advanced analytics, and extensive third-party integrations. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has a broader feature set that appeals to users with complex needs.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users seek better documentation, improvements in query performance, and enhanced data visualization tools. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users call for simplified setup processes, more intuitive interface design, and enhanced customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix's straightforward deployment and responsive support team are highlights. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, though feature-rich, has a more complex deployment process with mixed reviews on customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is considered cost-effective and offers a favorable return on investment. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, although more expensive, is viewed by users as a worthwhile investment due to its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (39th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), API Management (29th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

More Coralogix pros

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

Cons

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

More Coralogix cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 29% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

April 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.