Coralogix vs Sentry comparison

Coralogix and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sentry is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.6. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,527 Views
1,158 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 13 Sentry reviews

9,836 Views
8,860 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Coralogix and Sentry are two prominent players in the field of logging and monitoring services. Coralogix seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Sentry is preferred for its comprehensive features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Coralogix users value its real-time alerting, scalability, and ease of integration. Sentry users appreciate its detailed error tracking, performance monitoring, and seamless integration with various platforms.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users note the need for enhanced visualization tools, a more intuitive setup process, and better reporting features. Sentry users suggest improvements in initial setup complexity, the learning curve for new users, and reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Sentry, while initially more complex to deploy, is backed by strong customer service that assists in overcoming the setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is praised for its competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI, making it a cost-effective choice. Sentry, despite higher initial costs, delivers excellent value for money through comprehensive features and performance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Sentry Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Sentry

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (39th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), API Management (29th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 7.0%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Abdullah Baig

Software Dev at AF AB

An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing

Sentry was easy to learn compared to New Relic and Azure Monitor. I saw some valuable input. It took us the least amount of time to see how Sentry is valuable. It took just a few minutes. Session Replay provides a replay of the recorded errors. It is a good feature. Azure Monitor does not have this feature. The error reporting is straightforward. We can see everything that we need to see. The dashboard seems pretty fine. The product performs well. We can see the user's IP addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

More Coralogix pros

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools."

"The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides."

"It's a great visibility tool for the developer team."

"Overall, I give Sentry a rating of 10."

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs."

"The product performs well."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

More Coralogix cons

"It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location."

"We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features."

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved."

"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."

"I have not worked with Sentry long enough to provide advice for improvements. I need more experience and time."

"The settings for an administrator are complex."

"I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sentry?

The product performs well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

The product costs $26 a month if we choose a yearly subscription. Code coverage can be added for an additional $29 per month. The Team plan is the cheapest package available. We can make our own bu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

I have not worked with Sentry long enough to provide advice for improvements. I need more experience and time.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 29% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 14% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Sentry

Compared 10% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear Insight Hub vs Sentry

Compared 1% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

April 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download Sentry product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Sentry is a tool for monitoring web and application performance, tracking errors, processing request times, and managing user data access.

Developers integrate Sentry with web and application environments to capture front-end and back-end errors, utilize error logs, trace requests, and observe metrics without real-time production access. Sentry's use extends to monitoring internal applications, leveraging CyberArk PAM integration, deploying notifications, and detecting silent failures. Users benefit from detailed error and performance reports, contextual cause-stack information, and real-time breakdowns. There is room for improvement, as users desire refined integration and administrative settings, enhanced alert policies, and more customization in event metrics.

What are Sentry's most important features?

Integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira for smoother workflow
Detailed error and performance reports for clearer insights
AWS Lambda compatibility for cloud functions
Contextual cause-stack information helps pinpoint issues
Real-time breakdowns for immediate data
Session Replay for reviewing user sessions

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Sentry?

Efficient error tracking and monitoring improves application stability
Integration with major tools enhances team collaboration
User-friendly interfaces deliver a smooth learning curve
Security features provide peace of mind
ETL pipeline orchestration streamlines data handling

Sentry is implemented across industries ranging from tech startups to large enterprises. These organizations use Sentry to enhance application reliability, track performance, and secure user data within protected environments. Integration with CyberArk PAM ensures secure deployment. Organizations find Sentry useful for monitoring internal applications, efficiently processing request times, and tracing changes in production without direct access.

Sentry

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Sentry

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.