Coralogix vs Mezmo comparison

Coralogix and Mezmo are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Mezmo is ranked #76. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Mezmo’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,527 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

202 Views
115 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Coralogix and Mezmo compete in the log analytics and monitoring field. Coralogix is favored for its integration capabilities, while Mezmo is preferred for its troubleshooting features, making it ideal for users who value feature depth.

Features: Coralogix provides strong integration options, efficient large data handling, and smooth deployment, making it suitable for enterprise environments. Mezmo offers robust troubleshooting features, comprehensive analytics, and a user-friendly interface, appealing to users seeking in-depth analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix could enhance its alerting mechanisms, provide more flexible customization, and diversify its data visualization options. Mezmo could improve its configuration process, offer better support quality, and enhance its data visualization features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix offers a smooth deployment process and consistent support services, ensuring reliable implementation and assistance. Mezmo is appreciated for its straightforward setup but faces inconsistencies in support service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is considered cost-effective with a high ROI, especially for enterprises handling large data volumes. Although Mezmo is relatively higher in price, it is seen as offering significant value for detailed analytics, justifying the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Mezmo

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Ranking in Log Management

39th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), API Management (29th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Mezmo

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

76th

Ranking in Log Management

54th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Observability Pipeline Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently

Scalability could be improved. We are using it through the IBM cloud deployment and on some of the data centers that are very heavily used, there is a significant lag in the event stream, sometimes 10, 15 minutes behind, which makes the RCA impossible. If an event hits but you don't have the information to look at it, then it's tricky. This is probably not an issue of the product itself, but more a deployment issue. There is something on the IBM side that needs some readjustment to make certain these lags don't happen too often. We now use other tools for back-up in that area. But if you really want to do SIEM type work, then that is an aspect that needs some improvement. It's hard to tell if it's the product or the IBM deployment of it. The user interface is really very productive interactively but for an additional feature, it would be nice if we somehow could encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team so that specific types of actions can be carried out quickly. In particular, when we deal with a customer issue, it may pertain to a particular transaction through the system and each transaction has a unique ID. It would be great if we could query that ID and request all transactions that pertain to a specific ID. For now, we need to find the events, then extract the ID. Once we have that, we can go through the UI to set up the query and filter it to give us a transaction. But it would be really nice if we could simply say, "Here's the ID. Give me all the transactions."

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

More Coralogix pros

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

Cons

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

More Coralogix cons

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 29% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 58% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 42% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

April 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Mezmo

April 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogDNA

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Mezmo

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.