We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Prometheus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The feature I found most valuable is the number of integrations. It is the industry standard for metrics."
"The best thing about Prometheus is its integration."
"The most valuable feature of Prometheus is its ability to collect metrics."
"Prometheus provides a flexible and adjustable querying and describing time, allowing for more responsive monitoring."
"The dashboard is very valuable."
"I like its lightweight configuration functions."
"The most valuable feature of Prometheus is the ease of pulling the metrics."
"It is a stable solution...Based on the feedback I have received from my colleagues in our company's IT department, the setup phase of the solution is relatively easy."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The solution's error handling part could be improved."
"The primary area where Prometheus could be improved is in terms of pricing, particularly when used with managed services."
"The alert functionality is kind of lackluster."
"Setting up the rules in Prometheus can be confusing, making it an area where improvements are required."
"There is a need for a more comprehensive overview of exporters, especially when dealing with many of them."
"There isn’t much clarity regarding the issues that happen at the server end. It is a push model and from the client’s point of view, it needs to look better and solve remote issues."
"Its documentation could be clearer to understand."
"A slight alteration to the user interface should be made to increase efficiency and streamline the process. Currently, we are utilizing Prometheus to gather and compile metrics and then utilizing Grafana to display them in the form of a graph. However, I believe that Prometheus has the capability to handle both of these tasks on its own, with perhaps the addition of a supplementary plugin. By doing so, the need for utilizing two separate applications will be eliminated."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Prometheus is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 32 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Prometheus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prometheus writes "A very flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Prometheus is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, Dynatrace, Sentry and AWS X-Ray. See our Coralogix vs. Prometheus report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
