Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CoreMedia vs Pimcore comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CoreMedia
Ranking in Digital Asset Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Web Content Management (9th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (9th)
Pimcore
Ranking in Digital Asset Management
11th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (11th), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (11th), Customer Data Platforms (CDP) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Digital Asset Management category, the mindshare of CoreMedia is 2.1%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pimcore is 2.1%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Asset Management
 

Featured Reviews

VB
Provides effective workflow management and catalog management
Around three to four engineers are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. The solution's e-commerce integration feature has impacted our marketing efforts and catalog management. CoreMedia is stable and strong in terms of editorial things. The solution has helped our organization manage translations for different languages. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
reviewer2296077 - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is easy to use, but the UI and UX must be improved
We implemented a project in the last eight months. We use the product for data transformation and e-commerce The solution is easy to use. The UI and UX must be improved. Automated data handling must be improved. I have been using the solution for six years. I am using the latest version of the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews."
"The solution is easy to use."
 

Cons

"It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure."
"The UI and UX must be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
30%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CoreMedia?
CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreMedia?
Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
What needs improvement with CoreMedia?
It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure. The solution's integration and multimedia could be improved.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pimcore?
I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement with Pimcore?
The UI and UX must be improved. Automated data handling must be improved.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), N24, Bild.de, Nation Media Group, ARD, ZDF, M. DuMont Schauberg
Deutsche Bahn AG, Burger King, Intersport, Bösch, BuildDirect, Gogo, Ikea, GANT, Peugeot Motorcycles, Heidelberg, NextJet, Antonio Viani Importe GmbH, Deutsche Bahn AG, T-Mobile
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Cloudinary, Box and others in Digital Asset Management. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.