Adobe Experience Manager vs CoreMedia comparison

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"The most valuable features of Adobe Experience Manager include its capability to manage content and create reusable fragments."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer."

"Easy to work with the solution."

"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"I like the profiling and segmentation."

"CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews."

"I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"A little bit of background knowledge of coding and website structure is required."

"Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

"It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"It's really costly."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."