CoreMedia vs Sitecore Experience Manager comparison

CoreMedia and Sitecore are both solutions in the Web Content Management category. CoreMedia is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sitecore is ranked #8. CoreMedia holds a 1.7% mindshare in WCM, compared to Sitecore’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CoreMedia users are willing to recommend the solution.

CoreMedia

Read 1 CoreMedia review

209 Views
150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sitecore Experience Manager

Read 1 Sitecore Experience Manager review

702 Views
468 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

CoreMedia

Sitecore Experience Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CoreMedia and Sitecore Experience Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Wordpress, Microsoft, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CoreMedia

Ranking in Web Content Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (9th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (7th)

Sitecore Experience Manager

Ranking in Web Content Management

8th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of CoreMedia is 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sitecore Experience Manager is 2.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Content Management

Featured Reviews

Vinceno Barone

CDO at Intellidio

Provides effective workflow management and catalog management

Around three to four engineers are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. The solution's e-commerce integration feature has impacted our marketing efforts and catalog management. CoreMedia is stable and strong in terms of editorial things. The solution has helped our organization manage translations for different languages. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

it_user72771

Info Sec Consultant at Size 41 Digital

It's a CMS with the usual features and functions. It was an old version and for us to move to a newer version we had to take three separate projects with each one incurring significant cost.

I feel a little bad giving Sitecore a 6/10, because I think the problems the organisation I worked for had with it were partially because of: - shiny toy purchase - not fit for the org's purpose (more to do with the org) - UX and UI was poor meaning users didn't engage with it even after…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

39%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreMedia?

Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreMedia?

It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure. The solution's integration and multimedia could be improved.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Magnolia CMS vs CoreMedia

Compared 59% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs CoreMedia

Compared 41% of the time

More CoreMedia Competitors

Magnolia CMS vs Sitecore Experience Manager

Compared 34% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Sitecore Experience Manager

Compared 22% of the time

Drupal vs Sitecore Experience Manager

Compared 22% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Sitecore Experience Manager

Compared 22% of the time

More Sitecore Experience Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

October 2024

Download CoreMedia product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

October 2024

Download Sitecore Experience Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sitecore XM

Learn More

CoreMedia

Sitecore

Overview

CoreMedia is the complete content and digital asset management platform, featuring built-in eCommerce integrations and a secure, modular architecture. Innovate faster, improve efficiency, regain creative control, and boost ROI across all your online properties.

For those who want a robust CMS without all the digital marketing power of the Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), the Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) empowers you to deliver the right content, to the right person, exactly at the right time.

Sample Customers

Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), N24, Bild.de, Nation Media Group, ARD, ZDF, M. DuMont Schauberg

easyJet, Toshiba, Thomas Cook Travel Group, Oxfam, New York Life, Jabra, Graf von Faber-Castell, Canon, Boy Scouts of America

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wordpress, Microsoft, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.