Coverity vs ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform comparison

The compared Black Duck and ERPScan solutions aren't in the same category. Black Duck is ranked #4 in SAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.9% mindshare in the category. ERPScan is ranked #51 in AS , and holds a 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

12,384 Views
8,537 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Read 1 ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform review

122 Views
54 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Coverity

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coverity and ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th)

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (51st)

Mindshare comparison

Coverity and ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Coverity is designed for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and holds a mindshare of 7.9%, up 7.0% compared to last year.
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.0% mindshare, up 0.0% since last year.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

TundeOgunkoya

Consulting Partner, Cyber Security Delivery - Africa at DeltaGRiC Consulting

Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support

The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic. The last time we did it, the customer was trying to make the SAP system match the GDPR process. We were able to use it for that benchmark. It was very important. The GDPR assessment template that is being used in the process application benchmark and analyzing landscape came in very handy. It was very useful because it also gave notifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has deeper scanning capabilities."

"The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use."

"In my opinion, the most effective Coverity feature for identifying critical vulnerabilities is the extra checks, which offers deep analysis."

"The product is easy to use."

"Coverity is scalable."

"Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime."

"It help us identify the latest security vulnerabilities."

"It's very stable."

More Coverity pros

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

Cons

"Right now, the Coverity executable is around 1.2GB to download. If they can reduce it to approximately 600 or 700MB, that would be great. If they decrease the executable, it will be much easier to work in an environment like Docker."

"Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."

"Coverity takes a lot of time to dereference null pointers."

"The product could be enhanced by providing video troubleshooting guides, making issue resolution more accessible. Troubleshooting without visual guides can be time-consuming."

"We actually specified several checkers, but we found some checkers had a higher false positive rate. I think this is a problem. Because we have to waste some time is really the issue because the issue is not an issue. I mean, the tool pauses or an issue, but the same issue is the filter now.Some check checkers cannot find some issues, but sometimes they find issues that are not relevant, right, that are not really issues. Some customisation mechanism can be added in the next release so that we can define our Checker. The Modelling feature provided by Coverity helps in finding more information for potential issues but it is not mature enough, it should be mature. The fast testing feature for security testing campaign can be added as well. So if you correctly integrate it with the training team, maybe you can help us to find more potential issues."

"The solution could use more rules."

"There should be additional IDE support."

"There is an extra step in my organization that involves uploading to servers, which adds overhead."

More Coverity cons

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on the usage types, one has to opt for different types of licenses from Coverity, especially to be able to use areas like report viewing or report generation."

"The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

"This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"The solution is affordable."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"The tool was fairly priced."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 51% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

March 2025

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

March 2025

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform report

Download ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

No data available

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

ERPScan’s primary mission is to bridge the gap between technical and business security, and provide solutions to evaluate and secure SAP and Oracle ERP systems and business-critical applications from both, cyber-attacks as well as internal fraud.

ERPScan

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Wired

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.