Coverity vs ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform comparison

The compared Black Duck and ERPScan solutions aren't in the same category. Black Duck is ranked #4 in SAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.8% mindshare in the category. ERPScan is ranked #52 in AS , and holds a 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

12,653 Views
8,729 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Read 1 ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform review

115 Views
50 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Coverity

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coverity and ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th)

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

Coverity and ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Coverity is designed for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and holds a mindshare of 7.8%, up 7.1% compared to last year.
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.0% mindshare, up 0.0% since last year.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

TundeOgunkoya

Consulting Partner, Cyber Security Delivery - Africa at DeltaGRiC Consulting

Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support

The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic. The last time we did it, the customer was trying to make the SAP system match the GDPR process. We were able to use it for that benchmark. It was very important. The GDPR assessment template that is being used in the process application benchmark and analyzing landscape came in very handy. It was very useful because it also gave notifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent."

"Provides software security, and helps to find potential security bugs or defects."

"It provides reports about a lot of potential defects."

"It's very stable."

"The most valuable feature of Coverity is that it shows examples of what is actually wrong with the code."

"The product is easy to use."

"I like Coverity's capability to scan codes once we push it. We don't need more time to review our colleagues' codes. Its UI is pretty straightforward."

More Coverity pros

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

Cons

"SCM integration is very poor in Coverity."

"Coverity is not stable."

"We'd like it to be faster."

"The product could be enhanced by providing video troubleshooting guides, making issue resolution more accessible. Troubleshooting without visual guides can be time-consuming."

"Reporting engine needs to be more robust."

"The quality of the code needs improvement."

"The reporting tool integration process is sometimes slow."

"The solution's user interface and quality gate could be improved."

More Coverity cons

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

"Coverity is quite expensive."

"The tool's price is somewhere in the middle. It's neither cheap nor expensive. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is low, and ten is high price."

"I rate Coverity's price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 51% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

February 2025

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2025

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform report

Download ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

No data available

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

ERPScan’s primary mission is to bridge the gap between technical and business security, and provide solutions to evaluate and secure SAP and Oracle ERP systems and business-critical applications from both, cyber-attacks as well as internal fraud.

ERPScan

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Wired

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.