Coverity vs Fortify Application Defender comparison

The compared Black Duck and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Black Duck is ranked #4 in SAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.8% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #34 in AS , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

12,653 Views
8,729 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Fortify Application Defender

Read 11 Fortify Application Defender reviews

1,041 Views
853 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Coverity

Fortify Application Defender

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coverity and Fortify Application Defender based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. Fortify Application Defender Report (Updated: September 2022).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. Fortify Application Defender

September 2022

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th)

Fortify Application Defender

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (34th)

Mindshare comparison

Coverity and Fortify Application Defender aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Coverity is designed for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and holds a mindshare of 7.8%, up 7.1% compared to last year.
Fortify Application Defender, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.6% mindshare, down 0.8% since last year.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

Saroj-Patnaik

Software Development Engineer 3 at Ernst & Young

Reliable solution with excellent machine learning algorithms but expensive and lacking support

I primarily use Fortify Application Defender to assess whether our products can defend against applications Fortify Application Defender's most valuable features are machine learning algorithms, real-time remediation, and automatic vulnerability notifications. Fortify Application Defender gives…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides software security, and helps to find potential security bugs or defects."

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent."

"Considering the analysis part and the benchmarking process involving the product that my company carried out, the solution is good for finding bugs and violations"

"It's very stable."

"It has the lowest false positives."

"Coverity gives advisory and deviation features, which are some of the parts I liked."

"The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The product has been beneficial in logging functionality, allowing me to categorize vulnerabilities based on severity. This aids in providing updated reports on subsequent scans."

More Coverity pros

"We are able to provide out customers with a secure application after development. They are no longer left wondering if they are vulnerable to different threats within the market following deployment."

"The most valuable features of Fortify Application Defender are the code packages that are default."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically feed it rules what it's coupled with the WebInspect dynamic application scanning technology."

"Fortify Application Defender's most valuable features are machine learning algorithms, real-time remediation, and automatic vulnerability notifications."

"Its ability to find security defects is valuable."

"The most valuable feature is that it analyzes data in real-time."

"The product saves us cost and time."

"I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy."

More Fortify Application Defender pros

Cons

"Coverity is far from perfection, and I'm not 100 percent sure it's helping me find what I need to find in my role. We need exactly what we are looking for, i.e. security errors and vulnerabilities. It doesn't seem to be reporting while we are changing our code."

"The product should include more customization options. The analytics is not as deep as compared to SonarQube."

"The solution could use more rules."

"Sometimes, vulnerabilities remain unidentified even after setting up the rules."

"SCM integration is very poor in Coverity."

"Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations."

"Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."

"The solution is a bit complex to use in comparison to other products that have many plugins."

More Coverity cons

"Fortify Application Defender could improve by supporting more code languages, such as GRAAS and Groovy."

"The solution could improve the time it takes to scan. When comparing it to SonarQube it does it in minutes while in Fortify Application Defender it can take hours."

"The biggest complaint that I have heard concerns additional platform support because right now, it only supports applications that are written in .NET and Java."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"The false positive rate should be lower."

"The licensing can be a little complex."

"Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking."

"The workbench is a little bit complex when you first start using it."

More Fortify Application Defender cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

"The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."

"The tool's price is somewhere in the middle. It's neither cheap nor expensive. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."

"It is expensive."

"Coverity is quite expensive."

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."

"The product’s price is much higher than other tools."

"The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."

"The price of this solution could be less expensive."

"The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortify Application Defender?

I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Application Defender?

The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify Application Defender?

We use the solution for fast code review. It is integrated into our DevOps pipeline.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 51% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 34% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 12% of the time

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortify Application Defender Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

February 2025

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2025

Download Fortify Application Defender product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. Fortify Application Defender

September 2022

Free Report: Coverity vs. Fortify Application Defender

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. Fortify Application Defender and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. Fortify Application Defender report.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.