Coverity vs Qualys Web Application Scanning comparison

Black Duck and Qualys are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qualys is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4. Black Duck holds a 8.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Qualys’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

13,639 Views
9,320 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qualys Web Application Scan...

Read 35 Qualys Web Application Scanning reviews

3,812 Views
2,987 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Coverity

Qualys Web Application Scan...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 23, 2024

Qualys Web Application Scanning and Coverity operate in the web application security and static code analysis sectors, respectively. Based on user feedback, Qualys is favored for its superior threat identification, making it more suitable for security-focused tasks, whereas Coverity is noted for enhancing code quality in software development.

Features: Qualys Web Application Scanning users value its comprehensive scanning abilities, timely threat detection, and user-friendly reporting. Coverity is praised for its precise code analysis, integration with development environments, and detailed issue tracking.

Room for Improvement: Qualys Web Application Scanning feedback points to the need for better integration with development tools, enhanced reporting customization, and improved user interface simplicity. Coverity users suggest improvements in scanning speed, a more intuitive setup process, and better real-time issue notifications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualys Web Application Scanning deployment is straightforward, with customer service praised for responsiveness. Coverity’s deployment can be more complex, and while customer support is helpful, it’s noted as not being as prompt as Qualys.

Pricing and ROI: Qualys users generally find it offers good value for money given its robust security features. Coverity users, while acknowledging higher setup costs, feel the investment is justified by the gains in code quality and reduced technical debt.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualys Web Application Scan...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 8.5%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Web Application Scanning is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Cyber Security Chartered Engineer at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

SubhajitAich

Security Consultant at Cognizant

A stable solution that can be used for infrastructure vulnerability scanning and web application scanning

Qualys Web Application Scanning is very complex to use, and its graphical interface is not very user-friendly. Compared to other solutions like Tenable and Rapid7, you need to navigate a lot to get the actual results out of Qualys Web Application Scanning. If I have to search for one thing within the entire console, I have to look for it randomly. It's not very easy and very comfortable to find something. Overall, it's a very good solution, but it will be very good if the tool is more user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Coverity is that it shows examples of what is actually wrong with the code."

"Coverity is scalable."

"The most valuable feature of Coverity is its software security feature called the Checker. If you share some vulnerability or weakness then the software can find any potential security bug or defect. The code integration tool enables some secure coding standards and implements some Checkers for Live Duo. So we can enable secure coding and Azure in this tool. So in our software, we can make sure our software combines some industry supervised data."

"It has the lowest false positives."

"The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Jenkins."

"It's pretty stable. I rate the stability of Coverity nine out of ten."

"We were very comfortable with the initial setup."

More Coverity pros

"Key features include: Cloud-based, so the installation is not so tedious. Easily deployed. Highly scalable. Comprehensive reporting."

"Qualys' process of updating signatures is something we really appreciate, and it's way ahead of its industry peers."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the progressive scan. It is good. It's done in 24 hours."

"By using QualysGuard, we are able to finish external scans with assured results in half the time."

"Qualys Web Application Scanning has multiple features like threat protection and container security scanning in one box."

"QualysGuard web-based scanner is very useful for performing external penetration and PCI scans from remote locations."

"It combines both web application vulnerability management and internal vulnerability management on one platform and dashboard. Usually, you have to purchase separate tools."

"It is a good product for website penetration testing to detect vulnerabilities."

More Qualys Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"The solution could use more rules."

"There is an extra step in my organization that involves uploading to servers, which adds overhead."

"The product could be enhanced by providing video troubleshooting guides, making issue resolution more accessible. Troubleshooting without visual guides can be time-consuming."

"The product lacks sufficient customization options."

"Coverity's implementation cycle is very slow when integrating changes, especially for problems related to event handling and memory leaks."

"The solution is a bit complex to use in comparison to other products that have many plugins."

"Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations."

"The setup takes very long."

More Coverity cons

"The virus code updates are not frequent enough."

"The product's pricing could be better."

"Deployment can be complicated."

"The solution needs to adjust its pricing. They should make it more affordable."

"We procured around 110 licenses for Web Application Scanning, but we have issues running concurrent scans. I don't currently have the option to trigger scans for all 100-plus websites. The default limit is around 10 conference scans. It's not very scalable, to be honest, because of the limitation that they put on concurrent scans."

"There should be better visibility into the application."

"The area of false positives could be improved. There are quite a number of false positives as compared to other solutions. They could probably fine tune the algorithm to be able to reduce the number of false positives being detected."

"The reporting contains too many false positives."

More Qualys Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."

"The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is low, and ten is high price."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."

"This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

"It is expensive."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"From my perspective, it is a budget-friendly option."

"The cost is $30,000 USD for one year to cover WAS (Web Application Security) and the VM (Virtual Machine) security in a company with 200 employees."

"Licensing was based on the number of assets that you want to scan on your network. You can also do licensing on subscription. On subscription, it is easier and more flexible. You tell Qualys that you want to move from the 1000 to 2000 band or the 3000 or 5000 band, then they will give you the quotation for it. Once you pay for it, applying the licensing is quite easy and effective."

"The product has a very good licensing model."

"Qualys Web Application Scanning's pricing is a bit expensive compared to other solutions available in the market."

"There are different options available with respect to licensing."

"Qualys WAS' pricing is competitive."

"We normally purchase an annual license."

More Qualys Web Application Scanning pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

What do you like most about Qualys Web Application Scanning?

The vulnerability management feature is a strong one. And also the patch management feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Web Application Scanning?

The product pricing is fair and reasonably priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Web Application Scanning?

One area for improvement is the user interface. The new UI, which was recently upgraded, feels more complex and less user-friendly than the old version. However, as we continue to use it, we antici...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 53% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

OWASP Zap vs Qualys Web Application Scanning

Compared 19% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Qualys Web Application Scanning

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Qualys Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs Qualys Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Qualys Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

More Qualys Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

December 2024

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Web Application Scanning

December 2024

Download Qualys Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

Qualys WAS

Learn More

Black Duck

Qualys

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Qualys Web Application Scanning (WAS) is a fully cloud-based web application security scanner. The scanner will automatically crawl periodically and test web applications to discover potential vulnerabilities, including cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection. The consistent testing equips the automated service to generate consistent results, lessen false positives, and offer the ability to scale to protect thousands of websites effortlessly.

Qualys Web Application Scanning is bundled with different scanning technology to carefully scan websites for malware infections and will send notifications to website owners to assist in preventing blacklisting and brand reputation damage. As digital transformation takes place in various organizations, Qualys WAS gives organizations the ability to track and document their web app security status through its interactive reporting capabilities.

Qualys WAS empowers organizations to remediate any web application vulnerabilities quickly. Some of the key tools offered are:

Deep Scanning: All apps and APIs on your internal network and public cloud are covered by Qualys WAS deep scanning to show you any visible vulnerabilities.
DevSec Ops Tool: Detect security issues in your code while still in app development stages and generate comprehensive reports.
Comprehensive Discovery: Discover and catalog new and unknown web apps in your network.
Malware Detection: Scan a website, identify vulnerabilities, and receive alerts to any infections.

Benefits of Qualys Web Application Scanning

Qualys Web Application Scanning offers many benefits, including:

Quick Deployment: Requires no infrastructure or software to upkeep.
Effortless Scalability: Effortlessly launch a deep scan and protect thousands of websites.
Centralized Management: Manage and mend all web app vulnerabilities through a single interface.
Excellent Integration Capabilities: Integrates with Qualys Web App Firewall (WAF) for a single-click virtual patching of found vulnerabilities.
Respond to Threats Immediately: Qualys Continuous Monitoring offers the user a hands-free service by automatically launching scanning and sending notifications of a potential threat.
Cost-effective Solution: Data is analyzed in real time as Qualys WAS is an end-to-end solution; this helps avoid costs associated with managing multiple security vendors.

Reviews from Real Users

Qualys Web Application Scanning stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two of those reasons are its progressive scan and quick detection of vulnerabilities.

P.K., a senior software developer at a tech vendor, writes, "The feature that I have found most valuable is the progressive scan. It is good. It's done in 24 hours."

Nagaraj S., lead cybersecurity engineer at a tech service company, notes, "I have found the detection of vulnerabilities tool thorough with good results and the graphical display output to be wonderful and full of colors. It allows many types of outputs, such as bar and chart previews."

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

BskyB, Cartagena, ClearPoint Learning Systems, Connect Group, du, Fortrex Technologies, HBOR, HDI, Highlights for Children, The Lithuanian State Enterprise Centre of Registers, City of Miami Beach, Microsoft, MidlandHR, MSCI Inc., Northern Arizona University, Ofgem, Olympus Europa, PhoneFactor, RTL Nederland, ThousandEyes, VGZ Organisatie B.V.

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning

December 2024

Free Report: Coverity vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.