Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Broadcom and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Kovai.co is ranked #72. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Kovai.co’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...
Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews
  • 261 Views
  • 130 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management (CEAPM) and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) compete in application performance management. Turbo360 seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features tailored for serverless applications, despite higher costs.

Features: CEAPM offers comprehensive monitoring, in-depth analytics capabilities, and robust customer support. Turbo360 provides ease of integration with various platforms, powerful monitoring tools for serverless environments, and a specialized toolset for serverless applications.

Room for Improvement: CEAPM needs better documentation, more streamlined setup processes, and more ease-of-use enhancements. Turbo360 requires improvements in its alert management system, more customization options for reporting, and better customer support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CEAPM’s deployment process is cumbersome, but customer service is rated highly. Turbo360 users enjoy a quicker, more intuitive deployment experience but are less satisfied with customer support services.

Pricing and ROI: CEAPM’s pricing structure and setup costs are lower and provide a solid ROI. Turbo360, despite higher setup costs, is considered worth the investment due to its advanced tooling and performance benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
72nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (58th), Cloud Monitoring Software (46th), Cloud Cost Management (30th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review
reviewer1858887 - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized, great for performing corrective actions and has a helpful Business Activity Monitoring module
1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and a few more Azure services. 3) It would be much better if it is a multi-cloud management/monitoring platform. 4) The consolidated error reports sent via the alerting channels can be a bit more intuitive. 5) Their customer support was good but good technical documentation or feature videos can be even more helpful.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."
"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
 

Cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
"They lack support and presence in Egypt."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
42%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 63% of the time
Grafana vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
Grafana vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 38% of the time
More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reportDownload Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report
 

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Serverless360
 

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

  1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
  2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
  3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
  4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
  5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
    Kovai.co
     

    Sample Customers

    NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
    MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
    Buyer's Guide
    Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
    April 2025
    Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.