We performed a comparison between Grafana and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"Collaboration: Shares data and dashboards across teams."
"What I found most valuable in Grafana is that it has a lot of integrations and features that I need for data processing and visualization."
"The solution has good features."
"It has good stability."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"They should improve the functioning of its editing tool."
"The documentation or training provided by Grafana is limited compared to its competitors, like Splunk."
"It can take a considerable amount of time to learn the graphs if a long duration is selected."
"Its interface could be more accessible."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"There is room for improvement when using multiple dashboards because they can become complicated to keep track of and use."
"It is limited on the reporting type supported, which is important for managerial-level officers who want reports that are either general or specific."
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
Earn 20 points
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 76th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Grafana is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Sentry, Azure Monitor, Elastic Observability and Dynatrace, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.