Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Zabbix comparison

Broadcom and Zabbix are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Zabbix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Zabbix’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.
Zabbix
Read 105 Zabbix reviews
  • 5,514 Views
  • 4,263 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management (CEPAM) offer distinct solutions in performance monitoring. CEPAM appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and superior customer service, despite Zabbix's strong points in affordability and comprehensive support.

Features: Zabbix users value its extensive monitoring capabilities, ease of integration, and customizable alerts. CEPAM offers robust analytics, real-time data processing, and scalability. While Zabbix's features are impressive, the advanced analytics and scalability of CEPAM give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix needs enhancements in scalability, user experience, and documentation. CEPAM users suggest improvements in documentation, cost management, and user interface. Both products have specific areas for growth, but Zabbix's scalability issues are particularly significant.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix users find it fairly straightforward to deploy but highlight the need for improved customer service. CEPAM is appreciated for its smooth deployment process and excellent customer service, making it more appealing in those areas.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is praised for its low setup costs and quick ROI. CEPAM, despite higher initial costs, offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features. Users find Zabbix more cost-effective initially, but CEPAM's long-term benefits justify the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zabbix
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
105
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 3.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review
ASM Naushad Alam - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes
We have not yet purchased the commercial version so have a lack of technical ability. We do not yet fully know the key points or key features of the solution. We just use what we use along with WhatsUp Gold. Based on our use only, stability is rated a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."
"The technical support and documentation are quite good."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."
"During my testing, the features that I like the most are that it can be integrated with my system, and it provides me with reports of all of my servers."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."
"The solution is stable."
"The performance and bandwidth are valuable features."
More Zabbix pros
 

Cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
"They lack support and presence in Egypt."
"There are not too much documentation or manuals. We found the tutorials very easy to understand but do not go deep enough in the use of Zabbix. We need more manuals, proper use, documentation, etc."
"​I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes.​"
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"When it comes to troubleshooting or technical support, there is usually some time lag."
"Zabbix technical support is sold separately."
"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."
"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."
"Zabbix isn't a great tool for cloud-specific monitoring - its connection to public clouds needs to be improved. Other areas for improvement would be the lack of dashboards and integrations."
More Zabbix cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."
"It's free software released under the GNU/GPL license."
"It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."
"We are using the free, open-source version."
"Zabbix is a free solution but the support contact costs money."
"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
"It’s free of cost."
"I was using the free, Community Edition."
More Zabbix pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
What do you like most about Zabbix?
The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?
The cost is minimal. It is literally free.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zabbix?
For me, Zabbix is very straightforward. I cannot think of any improvements needed. It's a very mature product. The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
LibreNMS vs Zabbix Logo
LibreNMS vs Zabbix
Compared 10% of the time
Checkmk vs Zabbix Logo
Checkmk vs Zabbix
Compared 9% of the time
Icinga vs Zabbix Logo
Icinga vs Zabbix
Compared 8% of the time
NetXMS vs Zabbix Logo
NetXMS vs Zabbix
Compared 4% of the time
Centreon vs Zabbix Logo
Centreon vs Zabbix
Compared 4% of the time
More Zabbix Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Zabbix
March 2025
Zabbix reportDownload Zabbix product report
 

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
No data available
 

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services. 

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting. 

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix
 

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix
April 2025
Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix
Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.