CrowdStrike Observability vs Graylog Enterprise comparison

CrowdStrike and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. CrowdStrike is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while Graylog is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.4. CrowdStrike holds a 0.7% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Graylog’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Observability

Read 7 CrowdStrike Observability reviews

961 Views
951 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

Read 24 Graylog Enterprise reviews

7,823 Views
7,823 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Observability

Graylog Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Graylog Enterprise and CrowdStrike Observability compete in log management and infrastructure monitoring. CrowdStrike has the upper hand with advanced features and integration capabilities, although Graylog offers better pricing and customer support.

Features: Graylog Enterprise offers efficient log management with quick string search, message forwarding, and custom alerts. It supports real-time logging and full text-based searching with Elasticsearch integration. CrowdStrike Observability provides advanced monitoring with cloud vision, attack surface analysis, and strong predictive analytics. Its intelligent alerting system enhances network traffic analysis.

Room for Improvement: Graylog could enhance its data visualization capabilities and integration with third-party tools. Improving scalability for larger environments would increase its appeal. Adding more automated alert systems could also be beneficial. CrowdStrike could improve cost-effectiveness for smaller businesses. Enhancing data retention policies and reducing manual intervention for certain features might also help. A user-friendly interface that simplifies complex settings could enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Graylog Enterprise is noted for straightforward deployment and effective customer support. Its user-friendly interface simplifies troubleshooting. CrowdStrike Observability's cloud-native deployment allows rapid setup and seamless integration. Its efficient deployment model supports quick adaptation and superior support for onboarding processes.

Pricing and ROI: Graylog Enterprise is budget-friendly, ensuring good ROI for cost-conscious organizations. Its economical setup makes it a viable choice for smaller enterprises. CrowdStrike Observability requires higher initial investment but delivers long-term value through extensive monitoring and security insights, which could offer substantial returns despite the higher costs.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Observability vs. Graylog Enterprise Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Graylog Enterprise

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability

Ranking in Log Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Observability is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 5.0%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Graylog Enterprise	5.0%
CrowdStrike Observability	0.7%
Other	94.3%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

HectorRios

IT COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS at Américas BPS

Has provided reliable alerts and helped identify infrastructure issues through detailed reporting

The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls. Additionally, they have the agent, but the presentation in the management console is excellent as we have observability end-to-end with the servers and all the services configured in the use cases. The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues. Identifying performance bottlenecks is important because they collect numerous MD5 or hash keys including movements or playbooks. The way they organize that in the console is excellent, allowing you to have reports detecting issues, which not only includes detection but also provides solutions to those issues.

Read full review

NicolaeCIornii

Security Officer at JSC "Moldtelecom" S.A.

Log analysis has become clearer and faster but visualization and extensibility still need work

The problem was with the complexity and the cost to add extensions. We found this very expensive to buy another version with additional features. I think that Graylog Enterprise does not have customizable dashboards. I did not see them in Graylog Enterprise because most of the time we used the open source free version, which is limited. I think Graylog Enterprise should improve some things that they have in the paid version and perhaps provide users with a menu that gives examples of parsing logs and draws graphics so that people do not need to improve another system such as Grafana. This would be interesting. When it comes to functionalities, I found the log management in Graylog Enterprise acceptable. It is very simple to use and to collect logs. It has support for different protocols and different ports, and the sidecar is easy to use. However, in visualization, I think it needs to be much better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The price is worth it."

"The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues."

"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"CrowdStrike Observability offers strong predictive analytics capabilities, and the intelligent alerting system helps minimize noise and optimize IT resources effectively."

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"In the logs and the trajectory, it shows detailed information about where the source of infection comes from, how it travels, and how to reach there."

"The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls."

More CrowdStrike Observability pros

"I like the correlation and the alerting."

"It is used as a log manager/SIEM. It provides visibility into the infrastructure and security related events."

"The build is stable and requires little maintenance, even compared to some extremely expensive products."

"We run a containerized microservices environment. Being able to set up streams and search for errors and anomalies across hundreds of containers is why a log aggregation platform like Graylog is valuable to us."

"This had increased productivity for the dev and support teams, because we are directly notifying them."

"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."

"UDP is a fast and lightweight protocol, perfect for sending large volumes of logs with minimal overhead."

"The best feature of Graylog is the Elasticsearch integration. We can integrate and we can run filters, such as an event of interest, and those logs we can send to any SIEM tool or as an analytic. Additionally, there are clear and well-documented implementation instructions on their website to follow if needed."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

Cons

"The pricing is very high and small companies cannot afford it. They should reduce the price because the backend infrastructure is the same."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial."

"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."

"Technical support received a rating of 4 out of 10."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

More CrowdStrike Observability cons

"I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."

"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

"When it comes to configuring the processing pipeline, writing the rules can be very tedious, especially since the documentation isn't extensive on how the functions provided for these rules work."

"Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt."

"Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Also, the fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous."

"There should be some user groups and an auto sign-in feature."

"Dashboards, stream alerts and parsing could be improved."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?

The product at this moment is really good; CrowdStrike Observability is still working to improve it and they are including new features. At this time, I cannot provide an opinion about what else to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?

We are currently finishing the configuration of the solution, making the playbooks and configurations with the use cases. From CrowdStrike Observability, we use all the solution including XDR and a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?

We did not use Falcon Sandbox or Falcon Exposure Management. We are using a local partner and they have a marketplace, but we are working with a local partner from Google. We are just customers, no...

See all answers

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

I do not have any specific examples or numbers, such as time saved or incidents to share. Currently, I have no suggestions for how Graylog Enterprise can be improved, as there are no pain points or...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Lumen Security Log Monitoring vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Detective vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More CrowdStrike Observability Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 25% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 20% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Observability

January 2026

Download CrowdStrike Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

January 2026

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

Graylog2

Overview

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

CrowdStrike

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Graylog Enterprise

December 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Observability vs. Graylog Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Observability vs. Graylog Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Observability vs. Graylog Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.