CrowdStrike Observability vs Datadog comparison

CrowdStrike Observability

Read 205 Datadog reviews

23,433 Views
9,139 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Datadog and CrowdStrike Observability compete in the software monitoring and observability category. Datadog may have the upper hand with its feature-rich integrations and user-friendly dashboards, though CrowdStrike's predictive analytics and intelligent alerting also provide significant value.

Features: Datadog is known for its hosted infrastructure, customizable dashboards, and seamless integrations, enhancing user-friendliness for complex requirements. The extensibility and comprehensive metrics tracking make it suitable for diverse environments. CrowdStrike focuses on predictive analytics, intelligent alerting, and infrastructure insight, providing robust security and optimization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Datadog users find the pricing model complex and costly, especially at scale. Improving cost transparency and documentation could enhance user experience. Some users report inconsistencies in the newer features. CrowdStrike could improve by speeding up customer issue resolution and expanding integration across security solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog offers deployment flexibility across cloud environments, but its customer service, though generally good, can sometimes lack responsiveness. CrowdStrike excels with proactive deployment and customer support, known for quick resolutions and effective integration handling.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog's complex pricing, often escalating with log and APM usage, can result in high costs but offers returns by centralizing operations and reducing downtime. While expensive, CrowdStrike is valued for its premium security features, with both products delivering high ROI by enhancing efficiency and resource management.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Observability vs. Datadog Report (Updated: September 2025).

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Datadog

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,469 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability

Ranking in Log Management

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in Log Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Observability is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 5.7%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Datadog	5.7%
CrowdStrike Observability	0.5%
Other	93.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

HectorRios

IT COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS at Américas BPS

Has provided reliable alerts and helped identify infrastructure issues through detailed reporting

The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls. Additionally, they have the agent, but the presentation in the management console is excellent as we have observability end-to-end with the servers and all the services configured in the use cases. The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues. Identifying performance bottlenecks is important because they collect numerous MD5 or hash keys including movements or playbooks. The way they organize that in the console is excellent, allowing you to have reports detecting issues, which not only includes detection but also provides solutions to those issues.

Read full review

Prakash Pandey

IT Manager at Liberty Mutual Insurance

Has improved monitoring accuracy and enabled faster issue resolution through detailed alerting and transaction visibility

The best feature that Datadog offers is infrastructure monitoring, where it can look at the CPU utilization, different process utilization, all the processes which are running, and alert us in advance if things are going beyond normal threshold. I think everything about the features of Datadog is amazing. Datadog provides details up to the transactions. We can look at the transaction log too for the application, which is really helpful. Datadog has impacted our organization positively since we were previously using AppDynamics and then we switched to Datadog. It has improved a lot in our alerting and monitoring in the infrastructure space and application space. We can monitor business transactions and take proactive action. It is really great to take actions on the issues before an end user reports it, which is a great advantage for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"CrowdStrike Observability offers strong predictive analytics capabilities, and the intelligent alerting system helps minimize noise and optimize IT resources effectively."

"The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls."

"I find the most effective feature of CrowdStrike Observability to be its cloud vision and attack surface vision, which enhance network traffic analysis."

"In the logs and the trajectory, it shows detailed information about where the source of infection comes from, how it travels, and how to reach there."

"The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues."

"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."

More CrowdStrike Observability pros

"Datadog has made it much easier to have a central place for people to look for logs and made it much easier to notify them of any elevated error rates or failures."

"I have found the logging and tracing features the most valuable."

"Overall, the Data UI and the usability of customer features continue to improve."

"Integrating Datadog with other platforms has made our monitoring processes a bit easier. It's not super simple, but it's manageable."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the elastic container service."

"The application performance monitoring is pretty good."

"Anything I've wanted to do, I found a way to get it done through Datadog."

"It is a good one stop location where we keep all our data for our infrastructure, and it's also easier to navigate between different things."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"Technical support received a rating of 4 out of 10."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."

"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

More CrowdStrike Observability cons

"It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications."

"The logging could be improved in the future."

"We have recently had a number of issues with stability and delays on logging, monitoring, metric evaluation, and alerts."

"It would be nice to be able to graph metrics by excluding certain tags (like you can do in monitors)."

"It is far too easy to run up huge unexpected costs."

"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."

"Datadog could make their use cases more visible either through their docs or tutorial videos."

"While the documentation is very good, there are areas that need a lot of focus to pick up on the key details."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."

"I am not satisfied with its licensing. Its payment is based on the exported data, and there was an explosion of the data for three or four weeks. My customer was not alerted, and there was no way for them to see that there has been an explosion of data. They got a big invoice for one or two months. The pricing model of Datadog is based on the data. The customer was quite surprised about not being alerted about this explosion of data. They should provide some kind of alert when there is an increase in usage."

"Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"It didn't scale well from the cost perspective. We had a custom package deal."

"The price is better than some competing products."

"While it is an expensive product, I would rate the pricing level at four out of five."

"The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	94

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?

The product at this moment is really good; CrowdStrike Observability is still working to improve it and they are including new features. At this time, I cannot provide an opinion about what else to...

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?

We are currently finishing the configuration of the solution, making the playbooks and configurations with the use cases. From CrowdStrike Observability, we use all the solution including XDR and a...

What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?

We did not use Falcon Sandbox or Falcon Exposure Management. We are using a local partner and they have a marketplace, but we are working with a local partner from Google. We are just customers, no...

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Elastic Security vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Lumen Security Log Monitoring vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 9% of the time

More CrowdStrike Observability Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

CrowdStrike Observability

October 2025

Download CrowdStrike Observability product report

Download Datadog product report

October 2025

Overview

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

CrowdStrike

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's