CureMD EHR vs Epic Electronic Health Records comparison

CureMD and Epic are both solutions in the EHR category. CureMD is ranked #13, while Epic is ranked #1. CureMD holds a 0.4% mindshare in E, compared to Epic’s 27.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CureMD users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Epic users who would recommend it.

CureMD EHR

Read 1 CureMD EHR review

101 Views
54 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Epic Electronic Health Records

Read 1 Epic Electronic Health Records review

3,945 Views
2,221 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CureMD EHR

Epic Electronic Health Records

Categories and Ranking

CureMD EHR

Ranking in EHR

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Epic Electronic Health Records

Ranking in EHR

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the EHR category, the mindshare of CureMD EHR is 0.4%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Epic Electronic Health Records is 27.2%, up from 26.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

EHR

Featured Reviews

MICHAEL MBURU

Part Time physician at Agha Khan Hospital at Agha Khan Md

Enables doctors to prescribe patients' medication online through e-prescribing

Patient portal: It has an effective patient portal which allows the patient to book appointments with the doctor. E-prescribing: Enables doctors to prescribe patients' medication online It has made it easier for patients to access medical services from their homes without physically travelling…

Read full review

reviewer1406316

Sr. Programmer/Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

An essential product for hospitals and the leader in records collection in the US and Europe

They are improving the product every day. I think they need to break those upgrades down to a clearer model rather than continuous or agile delivery. They could do something like release a major version every quarter or six months, or do contained upgrades plus special options to upgrade anytime. Sometimes the frequency of the changes is just a little too much to follow and there are no typical, formal versioning points. It would be nice to see Epic in the cloud, and that is a question clients always ask. But so far I have not heard anything about Epic moving to the cloud. In my estimation, that means there is no such plan to move to the cloud, basically. Resisting a move to the cloud could be because of the current Epic infrastructure, and maybe they do not want to do that. It could also possibly be because of some type of security issues having to do with countries regulating the availability of critical information on the cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has made it easier for patients to access medical services from their homes without physically travelling to the hospital."

"Enables doctors to prescribe patients' medication online through e-prescribing."

"The number of features and modular capabilities are really an advantage of using this product."

Cons

"Improvement should be made to the billing department. It is too slow in responding to customer queries."

"The updates may be so frequent that they are actually confusing, although they are stable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Setup costs, pricing, and licensing are set at friendly prices, making it more helpful."

"It is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which EHR solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Healthcare Company

35%

University

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

No data available

Allscripts Sunrise EHR vs Epic Electronic Health Records

Compared 59% of the time

InterSystems TrakCare vs Epic Electronic Health Records

Compared 11% of the time

Orion Health EHR vs Epic Electronic Health Records

Compared 9% of the time

Siemens Soarian vs Epic Electronic Health Records

Compared 6% of the time

Cerner EMR vs Epic Electronic Health Records

Compared 4% of the time

More Epic Electronic Health Records Competitors

Learn More

CureMD

Video not available

Epic

Overview

CureMD's EHR is a certified web technology and integrated approach to service delivery enables seamless exchange of care management and information exchange across multiple platforms, systems and organizations - driving greater collaboration, productivity and patient safety.

Epic Electronic Health Records offers the following solutions: (1) Patient Engagement that give patients the tools to be healthier with MyChart. (2) Clinicals that help improve patients' health and care with EpicCare. Specialties & Ancillaries that provide specialty care: Curated Content flexible and pre-built content for specialties lets you focus on care and Community Expertise that is made up of experts in their fields, specialty steering boards contribute content and guide development to meet real-world specialty needs. (3) Mobile (4) Care at a Distance (5) Resolute Revenue Cycle (6) Managed Care (7) Population Health (8) Community Connect (9) Interoperability (10) Healthcare Reform and Regulatory Compliance

Sample Customers

Heart Rhythm Associates of NY

Mercy Health, MetroHealth System, Lakeland HealthCare, Cedars-Sinai Health, St. Luke's Health System, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital, Hawaii Pacific Health, Lancaster General Hospital

See our list of best EHR vendors.

We monitor all EHR reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.