Cybereason XDR vs Elastic Security comparison

Cybereason and Elastic are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while Elastic is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7. Cybereason holds a 0.7% mindshare in XDR, compared to Elastic’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Cybereason XDR

Read 3 Cybereason XDR reviews

1,495 Views
476 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Read 64 Elastic Security reviews

6,462 Views
5,515 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Cybereason XDR

Elastic Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Elastic Security and Cybereason XDR compete in endpoint protection and detection. Cybereason XDR has the upper hand due to its advanced features and flexibility, while Elastic Security offers budget-friendly options.

Features: Elastic Security offers robust search capabilities, comprehensive real-time threat analysis, and strong community support. Cybereason XDR provides machine learning-driven detection, automated incident response, and sophisticated threat-hunting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security requires enhanced scalability, better integration with third-party tools, and improvements in its technical support. Cybereason XDR needs more streamlined reporting, better integration within complex environments, and refined documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security has straightforward deployment but users suggest improvements in technical support. Cybereason XDR is praised for easy setup and responsive customer service, though documentation needs improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is cost-effective with attractive entry pricing, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Cybereason XDR, despite being more expensive, is seen as providing strong ROI due to its innovative features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason XDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Security

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (7th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason XDR is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Security is 6.1%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Peter Nowak

Business Development Manager for Cybereason at Bechtle

Integration of multiple firewalls enables advanced threat detection

The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable. Cybereason XDR facilitates two-way communication, where the firewall sends data to the Cybereason system, and it can communicate with the firewall to stop unwanted communication. Customers can deal with multiple types of firewalls with ease. The behavioral analytics help detect advanced threats when attackers use existing software. The multilayered protection approach, including NGAV, integrates XDR detection with antivirus to assess and counter threats effectively.

Read full review

SyedAli17

Assistant Director at PTA

Centralized monitoring improves security posture through rapid data processing

The processing part of Elastic Security ( /products/elastic-security-reviews ) is very interesting for us since we handle almost 7,000 to 8,000 alerts per minute. We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data. Additionally, Elastic Security helps improve the security posture of Pakistan through centralized visibility and real-time processing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cybereason XDR's most useful feature is the investigation."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines."

"ELK documentation is very good, so never needed to contact technical support."

"I use the stack every morning to check the errors and it's just so clear. I don't see any disadvantage to using Logstash."

"It's simple and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."

"It is very quick to react. I can set it to check anomalies or suspicious behavior every 30 seconds. It is very fast."

"It's open-source and free to use."

"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."

"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."

More Elastic Security pros

Cons

"Customer service is rated as a five out of ten. When they work and reach the right level, they are helpful, but getting to the right person can be time-consuming."

"There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems."

"Cybereason's customer support could be better."

"The one thing we sometimes have issues with is its integration with other security applications like antiviruses."

"Sometimes, the solution isn't the easiest to use."

"The solution needs to be more reactive to investigations. We need to be able to detect and prevent any attacks before it can damage our infrastructure. Currently, this solution doesn't offer that."

"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."

"The training that is offered for Elastic is in need of improvement because there is no depth to it."

"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."

"This type of monitoring is not very mature just yet. We need more real-time information in a way that's easier to manage."

"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."

"If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve."

More Elastic Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper than Microsoft Defender. It has a subscription and no standard license."

"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."

"There is no charge for using the open-source version."

"We are using the free, open-source version of this solution."

"Its price is fine. Its licensing works on a yearly basis. We have to renew the license every year. I also have a good experience with Darktrace. When we buy Darktrace, we get training free of cost, which is not there in Elastic. We have to pay extra for training. There is certainly room for improvement."

"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

"I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10."

"Affordable but with additional costs"

"Compared to other products such as Dynatrace, this is one of the cheaper options."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cybereason XDR?

The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cybereason XDR?

There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems. Additionally, technical support has been slow in recent times. Enabling multifactor authentication has been problematic fo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason XDR?

I use Cybereason XDR for customers who don't have a SOC or managed SOC yet and want to be protected on more than their desktops. It is especially used in the manufacturing industry, yet not exclusi...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels. However, a direct comparison was not made due to different pricing structures.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 47% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 15% of the time

Cynet vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 12% of the time

More Cybereason XDR Competitors

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 22% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

March 2025

Download Cybereason XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

April 2025

Download Elastic Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Overview

Cybereason is the leader in endpoint protection, offering endpoint detection and response, next-generation antivirus, and managed monitoring services. Founded by elite intelligence professionals born and bred in offense-first hunting, Cybereason gives enterprises the upper hand over cyber adversaries.

Cybereason

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Sample Customers

MOTOROLA MOBILITY

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security

March 2025

Free Report: Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.