Top 10 Cybereason XDR Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Cybereason XDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cybereason XDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Microsoft Defender XDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cybereason Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cybereason, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive security features with effective customer support, making it ideal for those seeking advanced threat intelligence and ease of deployment. In comparison, Cybereason XDR provides robust detection capabilities and seamless integration, appealing to users needing extensive features in complex environments.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason XDR Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon offers a streamlined setup process with minimal initial costs, while Cybereason XDR involves a higher setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon offers a streamlined setup process with minimal initial costs, while Cybereason XDR involves a higher setup cost.

Wazuh

3.7 out of 5

Wazuh

3.7 out of 5

Cybereason XDR offers precise endpoint threat detection and comprehensive security, appealing to those prioritizing streamlined deployment and support. In comparison, Wazuh offers flexibility and customization, attracting users seeking cost-effectiveness and extensive monitoring with open-source adaptability.

Download Cybereason XDR vs. Wazuh Report

Pricing

Cybereason XDR requires a higher setup cost, while Wazuh offers a lower initial expense, highlighting a key cost difference in deploying these security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Cybereason XDR requires a higher setup cost, while Wazuh offers a lower initial expense, highlighting a key cost difference in deploying these security solutions.

Microsoft Defender XDR

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender XDR

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender XDR provides strong integration and automation within the Microsoft ecosystem, beneficial for users within that environment. In comparison, Cybereason XDR excels with behavioral analytics and multi-vendor deployment capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive threat analysis across diverse systems.

Download Cybereason XDR vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report

Pricing

Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower setup cost compared to Cybereason XDR, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Cybereason XDR might offer more comprehensive features justifying its additional setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR is favored for its seamless integration and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for existing Palo Alto environments. In comparison, Cybereason XDR, known for its advanced threat detection and comprehensive analysis, appeals to those prioritizing superior endpoint security despite higher upfront costs.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Cybereason XDR Report

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cybereason XDR, which offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cybereason XDR, which offers a more cost-effective setup.

Trellix Endpoint Security

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security excels in threat detection and real-time response, offering an intuitive deployment process. In comparison, Cybereason XDR provides comprehensive coverage and robust integration, appealing to those seeking extensive security despite a higher cost and potential learning curve.

Download Cybereason XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security involves a straightforward setup cost, while Cybereason XDR is known for its higher initial investment. Trellix offers ease of deployment, contrasting with Cybereason's robust feature set justifying its premium pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Trend Vision One

4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One

4.3 out of 5

The Trend Micro Vision One platform is designed to extend threat detection and response across an organization's digital landscape. It is crafted to deliver advanced threat intelligence, using a layered approach to protect against a wide range of cyber threats.

Download Cybereason XDR vs. Trend Vision One Report

Pricing

It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.

The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.

View comparison

Pricing

It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.

The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.

Cynet

4.4 out of 5

Cynet

4.4 out of 5

Cynet offers comprehensive threat detection and easy integration with strong customer service and competitive pricing. In comparison, Cybereason XDR is valued for advanced threat intelligence and detailed analytics, with superior features justifying its cost, appealing to users seeking deeper insights and long-term value.

Download Cybereason XDR vs. Cynet Report

Pricing

Cynet's setup cost is typically lower, providing a cost-effective solution, while Cybereason XDR's setup requires a higher investment, offering advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Cynet's setup cost is typically lower, providing a cost-effective solution, while Cybereason XDR's setup requires a higher investment, offering advanced features.

Mandiant Advantage

4.3 out of 5

Mandiant Advantage

4.3 out of 5

Mandiant Advantage offers accurate threat intelligence and seamless integration, appealing for its affordability and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cybereason XDR attracts attention with advanced detection capabilities and high ROI, despite higher costs and a steeper initial learning curve.

Download Cybereason XDR vs. Mandiant Advantage Report

Pricing

Mandiant Advantage requires a notable setup cost, while Cybereason XDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Differences in initial cost could influence user choice significantly.

View comparison

Pricing

Mandiant Advantage requires a notable setup cost, while Cybereason XDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Differences in initial cost could influence user choice significantly.

Stellar Cyber Open XDR

1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR

1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with automated incident response and centralized data correlation. Its seamless integration provides visibility and management. Advanced analytics and machine learning identify threats efficiently. Users appreciate its integration, real-time detection, and automation but suggest better third-party integration, documentation, and more intuitive setup.

Pricing

It’s a single license platform.

View comparison

Pricing

It’s a single license platform.

TEHTRIS XDR

1 out of 5

TEHTRIS XDR

1 out of 5

The XDR infrastructure brings together several security solutions within a single coherent platform, capable of detecting and responding to security incidents.

View comparison

Related categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Identity Management (IM)