Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter vs SolarWinds Virtualization Manager comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.9
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support and efficient issue resolution, maintaining high overall satisfaction.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager's customer service is praised for its knowledgeable support, timely responses, and effective assistance despite some delays.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.0
IBM Turbonomic needs an updated user interface, enhanced reporting, better documentation, and improved integration with third-party tools.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager needs better UI, reporting, integration, pricing, and support for hardware SNMP mibs, especially with Dell.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
IBM Turbonomic scales effectively, managing large environments and thousands of virtual machines with flexible licensing and strong support.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager efficiently scales across environments, reliably managing VMs with minimal administration despite varying usage levels.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, cost-effective pricing, with significant savings over additional VMware hosts; negotiate for tailored deals.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager offers valuable, scalable enterprise virtualization management with included support, despite requiring costly annual licensing consultation.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
IBM Turbonomic is highly stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, maintaining strong performance and reliable recovery from disruptions.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager generally stable, though some users faced issues requiring support, with problems resolved after updates.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency through automation, resource optimization, workload management, integration, and efficient cost-performance balance.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager improves efficiency with VM-level monitoring, automation, and insights, optimizing infrastructure and simplifying virtual environment management.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Turbonomic
Sponsored
Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Cloud Management (4th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st)
Dell OpenManage Integration...
Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds Virtualization M...
Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools
7th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Virtualization Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 16.7%, down from 20.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter is 1.0%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is 7.5%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtualization Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SubashSubbiah - PeerSpot reviewer
It can tell us where performance is lagging on the hardware layer, but the reporting on the application layer is lacking
The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer. I would like them to add some apps for physical device load resourcing and physical-to-virtual calculation. It gives excellent recommendations for the virtual layer but doesn't have the capabilities for physical-to-virtual analysis. Automated deployment is something else they could add. Some built-in automation features are helpful, but we aren't effectively using a few. We want a few more automated features, like autoscaling and automatic performance optimization testing would be useful.
it_user6405 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deploying vSphere Hosts with Dell’s Management Plugin for vCenter
The Dell Management Plugin for vCenter is a paid product from Dell that allows management of the physical infrastructure through the vSphere Windows Client. It’s a nifty tool that provides a lot of functionality if your environment is Dell only and are either 11G and 12G servers (9G/10G are…
Wapelo Zaphaniah - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool with an easy initial setup phase and high scalability that needs to improve its pricing and include reporting features
The problem or issue with the product is related to its pricing. The solution can be made free, especially for those who are using Dell products. The monitoring part is taken care of after SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is integrated into Dell IDRAC. If the aforementioned integration is not carried out, then you have to pay money separately to receive or utilize the services from SolarWinds. In the future, the product should have reporting features. The reporting feature would allow users to get whatever information they are looking for rather than having to do it manually.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
5%
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is...
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SolarWinds Virtualization Manager?
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is a great tool that is easy to use...It is a stable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Virtualization Manager?
The maintenance and support are a part of the package, meaning it is included in the product's price.
What needs improvement with SolarWinds Virtualization Manager?
The problem or issue with the product is related to its pricing. The solution can be made free, especially for those ...
 

Also Known As

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter , Dell Management Plug-in for VMware vCenter
SolarWinds VMAN
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
FAW Foundry, Viasat
Elliot Health System
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Virtualization Management Tools. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.