Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell PowerEdge FX vs HPE Apollo Systems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.0
Dell PowerEdge FX support is rated highly for responsiveness, with efficient problem resolution and competent technical team.
No sentiment score available
HPE Apollo Systems offers improving 24/7 support with expert access, though transparency and partner support issues persist.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.3
Dell PowerEdge FX needs better documentation, management, NVMe support, network card options, pricing, delivery times, and manufacturing improvements.
Sentiment score
4.3
HPE Apollo Systems face challenges with integration, outdated hardware, connectivity, licensing, support, and deployment, affecting user satisfaction.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Dell PowerEdge FX offers scalability and adaptability, efficiently supporting diverse user needs with simple upgrades and integration.
Sentiment score
7.2
HPE Apollo Systems scales efficiently, offering adaptability and cost-efficiency, handling compute-heavy workloads for varied sectors with ease.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Enterprise users have mixed views on Dell PowerEdge FX pricing, with costs influenced by specifications, maintenance, and licensing options.
No sentiment score available
HPE Apollo Systems' pricing is competitive yet costly, with straightforward licensing fees that vary based on usage and solutions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Dell PowerEdge FX is praised for high stability, long-term uptime, and seamless integration with hyperconverged infrastructure since 2017.
Sentiment score
8.6
HPE Apollo Systems are highly rated for stability, showing improved reliability and consistent uptime over several years despite challenges.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
9.0
Dell PowerEdge FX delivers high performance, scalability, efficiency, and seamless VMware integration, with customizable servers and robust management tools.
Sentiment score
7.9
HPE Apollo Systems provide cost-effective, scalable solutions with high compute density and flexibility, ideal for AI and diverse applications.
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerEdge FX
Ranking in Rack Servers
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Apollo Systems
Ranking in Rack Servers
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Density Optimized Servers (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of Dell PowerEdge FX is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Apollo Systems is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rack Servers
 

Featured Reviews

MarcGaethofs - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly stable product that seamlessly integrates with the storage portfolio and provides excellent technical support
We have a lot of questions during the order process. They get answered well. The machines are ready to go when we switch on the power. It will depend on our configuration. If we don't make an order with all the configuration specs in it, we’ll get nothing. We will have to do it all by ourselves. Which isn't a problem, but it will take longer. The solution is deployed on-premise, but we're transitioning to more hybrid solutions. We have a team for storage and connectivity. We also have a team for switching and networking. We need three to five enterprise system engineers to build a normal-sized cluster with 500 users. We also need a project manager.
Aruna Udawatte - PeerSpot reviewer
An affordable and easy-to-implement solution, but its after-sales support and technical support should be improved
We use HPE Apollo for specific requirements of Linux servers HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products. HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved. The solution should provide fast delivery when it comes to replacing a…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Legal Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge FX?
The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge FX?
I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price.
What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge FX?
When it comes to Dell PowerEdge FX, the area of concern revolves around the delivery time where improvements are required.
What do you like most about HPE Apollo?
HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.
What needs improvement with HPE Apollo?
HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved. The solution should provide fast delivery when it comes to replacing a particular product that is under warranty.
What is your primary use case for HPE Apollo?
We use HPE Apollo for specific requirements of Linux servers.
 

Also Known As

PowerEdge FX
HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tracewell, Govers, AXA ASSISTANCE ITALIA
Weta Digital
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell PowerEdge FX vs. HPE Apollo Systems and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.