Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HPE Apollo Systems Logo

HPE Apollo Systems pros and cons

4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
1,177 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

HPE Apollo Systems are highly scalable, meeting the growing needs of various infrastructures with ease.
They provide significant enhancements in processing power and storage capacity, offering more HTDs and compute power at competitive pricing.
The systems are versatile, allowing for single-platform multiple use-case scenarios like Hadoop and Ceph, which simplifies integration.
HPE Apollo Systems boast high reliability with users experiencing no failures, emphasizing their robustness in operational environments.
They offer cost-effective solutions, particularly in scenarios requiring substantial video streaming and storage capacities.

CONS

Lustre appears to be somewhat unstable overall.
There is a shared battery for cache controllers that requires taking down all nodes for replacement.
Standardization efforts using Ubuntu Linux faced challenges due to unsupported RAID configurations by HPE.
Obtaining disks for storage expansion reported significant wait times.
Flexibility in running various network protocols could be enhanced.
 

HPE Apollo Systems Pros review quotes

it_user680184 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 7, 2017
Absolutely being able to mount into Omni-Path architecture, HFIs on those nodes, because we were the very first site in the world
Gayan Senadheera - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 21, 2023
With HPE Apollo, we can propose configurations with many hard drives, making it suitable for large storage needs.
it_user683202 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 13, 2017
It's going to meet our needs moving forward, it is scalable.
Learn what your peers think about HPE Apollo Systems. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user784059 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
It's very reliable. I haven't had a single failure at all in the year and a half; not the slightest problem with it.
it_user784011 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
We usually use three blades for two-rack units, and with enough storage, it's really a small system with a powerful CPU, powerful hard drives, powerful disks.
Principa575f - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 24, 2018
We're going to buy another Apollo 6500. We may configure it with half the number of GPUs because that may be all we need. In a sense, we can see the Apollo 6500 being so powerful that we only need half the GPU capability that we have now.
it_user784038 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
It's pretty flexible. You can choose how much storage you put on the server. You can have one to three nodes, depending on whether you want more CPU or storage.
SeniorAc7315 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
It enables us to implement software defined solutions very easily, because Apollo servers are certified for use with Linux systems
Irfan Basharat - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 16, 2023
HPE Apollo's support is the most valuable feature.
it_user784050 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 9, 2018
When we moved to the Apollo and all flash drives, we gained a lot of performance.
 

HPE Apollo Systems Cons review quotes

it_user680184 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 7, 2017
What's coming out in Gen 10 is very strong in terms of additional security.
Gayan Senadheera - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 21, 2023
If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo.
it_user683202 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 13, 2017
Lustre seems to be just a little bit unstable overall.
Learn what your peers think about HPE Apollo Systems. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user784059 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
One drawback which I had: When I needed to expand storage on the Apollo, I had significant problems getting disks for it. It was a very long wait-time. So, if I were to give any advice in regards to improving this product, I would say make more of the 8TB disks available quicker.
it_user784011 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
We would like to see SimpliVity on top of the Apollo.
Principa575f - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 24, 2018
I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding.
it_user784038 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
There is a shared battery for all cache controllers in the node. When you have to replace that element, you have to take down all three nodes and not just one.
SeniorAc7315 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2017
We would like to see improved cooling because that is quite an issue. If you put that much compute power into a single rack, cooling really becomes an issue. And there is room for improvement there.
Irfan Basharat - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 16, 2023
The solution's deployment, security, and scalability need improvement.
it_user784050 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 9, 2018
We have tried to used standardization using Ubuntu Linux and it's been hard. They had some difficulties getting the RAID configuration up and running because there are no drivers for it. It's not supported by HPE.