HPE Apollo Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Oracle are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.3% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

HPE Apollo Systems

Read 22 HPE Apollo Systems reviews

2,476 Views
1,885 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle SPARC Servers

Read 7 Oracle SPARC Servers reviews

2,276 Views
1,609 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

HPE Apollo Systems

Oracle SPARC Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HPE Apollo Systems and Oracle SPARC Servers are key players in enterprise computing. Users favor Oracle SPARC Servers for their robust features, despite HPE Apollo Systems' competitive pricing and support.

Features: HPE Apollo Systems are favored for their high-density, modular design, flexible configurations, and scalability, optimized for data-intensive tasks. Oracle SPARC Servers are recognized for reliability, security, and superior processing power, ideal for complex workloads.

Room for Improvement: HPE Apollo Systems could improve power consumption, better integration with existing ecosystems, and user experience. Oracle SPARC Servers need enhanced documentation, improved user support services, and simplified user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Apollo Systems are known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, making them user-friendly initially. Oracle SPARC Servers, despite a steeper learning curve, offer consistent post-deployment support with a knowledgeable team.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Apollo Systems provide cost-effective solutions with scalable configurations offering good ROI. Oracle SPARC Servers, while more expensive, justify higher costs with substantial ROI through performance and security advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Apollo Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Density Optimized Servers (2nd)

Oracle SPARC Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Apollo Systems is 4.3%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SPARC Servers is 3.9%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Gayan Senadheera

Director at Tyax Pvt Ltd

Offers higher capacities compared to other solutions, making it suitable for handling large storage needs

In terms of improvement, we could benefit from some training. If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo. Currently, we haven't received any specific training related to HPE Apollo throughout my career. If HPE Apollo provides training, we can share the knowledge with our partners, which could lead to more opportunities for HPE Apollo in the market. Deal protection and other support measures would also be beneficial, as they could help us achieve better results in this market.

Read full review

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

A rock-solid OS and rich virtualization features for hosting many VMs on one box

Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform. Oracle is focusing on the cloud platform with a PCA and standard x86 architecture. Linux is their other OS and is mostly in the cloud. We don't see much development happening on Solaris even though it came as an acquisition from Sun Microsystems. Eventually, the solution and its platform will die because there has been no new development on the Solaris end and we haven't seen new servers in the last five years. At this point, we are pretty sure there is no real roadmap or future for the solution. There is a shortage of expert engineers because Oracle is not pushing the technology. It is hard for us to find engineers because the number of people supporting us has considerably reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience."

"The cost benefit of this solution is most valuable. It is quite effective for the work for which we are using it. We are mainly running video servers on these, and we are quite happy with the resilience, density storage, and streaming capacity of the system."

"Apollo Systems provide stuff that standard services do not. More HTDs, more compute power, at very reasonable pricing."

"With HPE Apollo, we can propose configurations with many hard drives, making it suitable for large storage needs."

"We're going to buy another Apollo 6500. We may configure it with half the number of GPUs because that may be all we need. In a sense, we can see the Apollo 6500 being so powerful that we only need half the GPU capability that we have now."

"It enables us to implement software defined solutions very easily, because Apollo servers are certified for use with Linux systems"

"It's very reliable. I haven't had a single failure at all in the year and a half; not the slightest problem with it."

"HPE Apollo's support is the most valuable feature."

More HPE Apollo Systems pros

"The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible."

"The performance is the best feature."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"Our customers are happy with many features in Oracle SPARC Servers, like the automatic ASR feature."

"The operating system is rock solid and the best I have ever used."

"The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization."

"I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU."

Cons

"The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience."

"I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding."

"We have tried to used standardization using Ubuntu Linux and it's been hard. They had some difficulties getting the RAID configuration up and running because there are no drivers for it. It's not supported by HPE."

"The support from HPE Apollo could be better, they are making knowledgeable."

"The predictive analysis feature could be improved."

"HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved."

"We are quite happy with it, but its price and storage density can be better."

"Lustre seems to be just a little bit unstable overall."

More HPE Apollo Systems cons

"They have declared the end of life of the hardware."

"Oracle SPARC Servers should be fine-tuned well enough to work with the other servers and software products in the market, as it is an area where Oracle SPARC Servers lack."

"Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform."

"I would like to see a reduced price point."

"They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models."

"Like IBM, Oracle SPARC Servers should be able to run other open operating systems like Linux."

"The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."

"The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."

"It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."

"Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."

"There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."

"Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it."

"The hardware is expensive but it has very rich virtualization features that make it economical."

"The licensing is flexible."

"My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Apollo?

HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Apollo?

HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved. The solution should provide fast delivery when it comes to replacing a particular product that is under warranty.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Apollo?

We use HPE Apollo for specific requirements of Linux servers.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle SPARC Servers?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SPARC Servers?

My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution. My company's clients, who have paid for the licensing costs attached to the solution, have also engaged with so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SPARC Servers?

Oracle products are usually fine-tuned with the software of other Oracle products, like Oracle WebLogic Server Services, Oracle Database, and Oracle Core Banking Software and Solutions, as all the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 35% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 22% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Power Systems vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE Apollo Systems Competitors

IBM Power Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 40% of the time

Intel Server System vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 27% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle SPARC Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems

February 2025

Download HPE Apollo Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

February 2025

Download Oracle SPARC Servers product report

Also Known As

HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo

No data available

Overview

The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Oracle's SPARC S7, T7, and M7 Servers with always-on memory intrusion protection and comprehensive data encryption secure data with no performance penalty. Security in silicon features and Oracle Solaris protect data in memory from unauthorized access and stop malware before it gets in.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Weta Digital

University Hospitals Leuven, B&H Photo, Tuscon Electric Power, IS Nordic, Siemens

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

January 2025

Free Report: HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.