Top 10 Oracle SPARC Servers Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

7 reviews
83% willing to recommend

252 followers

Top Oracle SPARC Servers Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle SPARC Servers based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE ProLiant DL Servers, and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge is appreciated for its affordability and flexibility, offering compatibility and scalability across various workloads. In comparison, Oracle SPARC is preferred for its advanced security features and integrated analytics, catering to data-centric businesses despite a higher initial investment.

Download Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are noted for their cost-effective setup, while Oracle SPARC Servers have higher initial expenses due to sophisticated infrastructure.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are noted for their cost-effective setup, while Oracle SPARC Servers have higher initial expenses due to sophisticated infrastructure.

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

4.3 out of 5

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

4.3 out of 5

HPE ProLiant DL Servers emphasize flexibility and robust management tools, making them ideal for varied configurations and ease of deployment. In comparison, Oracle SPARC Servers offer superior security and data processing, providing strong ROI despite higher initial costs, suitable for long-term performance needs.

Download HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers have lower setup costs, whereas Oracle SPARC Servers come with higher initial investment for setup.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers have lower setup costs, whereas Oracle SPARC Servers come with higher initial investment for setup.

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers are valued for cost-effectiveness and flexible integration capabilities. In comparison, Oracle SPARC Servers provide premium performance and security, appealing to enterprises with compliance needs. Technical buyers may choose based on priorities like flexibility or robust performance.

Download Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers tend to have a lower setup cost compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which are known for their higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers tend to have a lower setup cost compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which are known for their higher initial investment.

IBM Power Systems

4.4 out of 5

IBM Power Systems

4.4 out of 5

Oracle SPARC Servers excel in encryption and security capabilities, making them an ideal choice for security-focused enterprises. In comparison, IBM Power Systems are preferred for performance scalability and reliability, catering to organizations needing superior productivity. Oracle's competitive pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while IBM’s advanced features justify its higher cost for a significant ROI.

Download IBM Power Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

The setup cost for Oracle SPARC Servers is considered high, whereas IBM Power Systems offers a more competitive initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for Oracle SPARC Servers is considered high, whereas IBM Power Systems offers a more competitive initial investment.

Intel Server System

3.3 out of 5

Intel Server System

3.3 out of 5

Storage is simple with the Intel Storage System JBOD2000 family, a 2U form factor system with support for twelve 3.5" LFF or twenty-four 2.5" SFF drives with a single or multi-cable connectivity. The JBOD2000 family includes redundant, hot-swap fans and the option for redundant, hot-swap power supplies. The JBOD2000S2 products support 6Gb/s SAS/SATA connectivity via industry-standard SFF-8088 connectors with the latest JBOD2000S3 version supports up to 12 Gb/s SAS connectivity via industry standard SFF-8644 connectors. All these JBOD offerings are designed to provide highly available and easily expandable storage for Intel servers at an affordable price point.

Download Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

The Intel Server System has lower setup costs compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which are notably higher in price.

View comparison

Pricing

The Intel Server System has lower setup costs compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which are notably higher in price.

HPE Apollo Systems

4.2 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems

4.2 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems excel in scalability and affordability, appealing to users with easy deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Oracle SPARC Servers prioritize security and reliability, attracting those valuing robust data integrity, despite higher costs and complex deployment.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

The HPE Apollo Systems have a competitive setup cost, making them appealing for budget-conscious enterprises, while Oracle SPARC Servers require a higher investment, reflecting their premium solution which may justify the cost for high-demand applications.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series offers scalability and integration for performance flexibility, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Oracle SPARC provides superior processing power and unmatched security features for those prioritizing security. Cisco UCS ensures easier deployment, while Oracle SPARC focuses on advanced features for long-term ROI.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which require a more substantial initial investment. This price difference highlights cost efficiency as a key consideration when choosing between these server options.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge FX

4.2 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge FX

4.2 out of 5

Oracle SPARC Servers excel with strong security for critical applications. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge FX offers flexibility and modularity for scalable deployments. Oracle suits heavy-duty needs, while Dell attracts those requiring adaptable solutions with competitive pricing.

Download Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

Oracle SPARC Servers involve a higher setup cost compared to Dell PowerEdge FX, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment. This significant difference in setup cost positions the Dell PowerEdge FX as the more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Rack Servers

Converged Infrastructure

Data Center Networking