Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Density Optimized Servers category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 9.3% mindshare in DOS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 23.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

Read 29 Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers reviews

170 Views
97 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HPE Apollo Systems

Read 22 HPE Apollo Systems reviews

281 Views
203 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

HPE Apollo Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and HPE Apollo Systems are prominent competitors in the server market. While Cisco gains an advantage in environments already using their technology due to performance and integration, HPE is notable for energy efficiency and features that appeal to high-compute applications.

Features: Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers are recognized for high throughput, integration with Cisco environments, and scalability. HPE Apollo Systems feature energy-efficient design, advanced management capabilities, and support for large-scale tasks.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS C-Series could improve by enhancing management ease, reducing physical footprint, and streamlining integration processes. HPE Apollo Systems could benefit from simplifying installation, enhancing support availability, and optimizing cost management for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers benefit from straightforward deployment and integration within Cisco-rich infrastructures, although customer service experiences vary. HPE Apollo Systems may require more complex setups, but offer reliable customer service, providing consistent support and long-term engagement satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive pricing with strong ROI, especially beneficial for enterprises with existing Cisco investments. HPE Apollo Systems, though potentially higher in initial cost, deliver excellent ROI due to their energy efficiency and performance for large-scale environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

Ranking in Rack Servers

5th

Ranking in Density Optimized Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Apollo Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

6th

Ranking in Density Optimized Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Density Optimized Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is 9.3%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Apollo Systems is 23.3%, down from 29.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Density Optimized Servers

Featured Reviews

Ehsan Emad

Head of IT at Synnapex

The VIC card is the most important feature.

I rate Cisco USC C-Series Rack Servers 10 out 10. If you plan to buy a C-Series, you should be clear about why you want to use it because the uses vary. different. Whether you're using Cisco, HPE, Dell or any other brand, it's essential to define your use case. For example, are you using it for a simulation graphics, calculations, etc.? Depending on the use case, you might want to go with a small server with more CPU. Sometimes you need a light CPU with a powerful GPU. For example, if we have a C-Series with four CPUs at the same time, or we have a server that's handled two CPUs at the same time—the purpose is crucial. C-Series is good enough compared to other competitors like HPE and the other ones. The HPE C20 is one unit and has a lot of RAM support, but the C-series is number one, in my opinion.

Read full review

Gayan Senadheera

Director at Tyax Pvt Ltd

Offers higher capacities compared to other solutions, making it suitable for handling large storage needs

In terms of improvement, we could benefit from some training. If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo. Currently, we haven't received any specific training related to HPE Apollo throughout my career. If HPE Apollo provides training, we can share the knowledge with our partners, which could lead to more opportunities for HPE Apollo in the market. Deal protection and other support measures would also be beneficial, as they could help us achieve better results in this market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's stability is good. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten."

"The C-series is the most valuable."

"What I really like about the Cisco USC Server is its service profile."

"The solution is reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is scalable."

"In most cases, computes compute, and there isn't much differentiation, but one point of differentiation is Intersight cloud management."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers are integration and customization."

"The hardware customization capabilities are great."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers pros

"We're going to buy another Apollo 6500. We may configure it with half the number of GPUs because that may be all we need. In a sense, we can see the Apollo 6500 being so powerful that we only need half the GPU capability that we have now."

"The solution is well documented in a data sheet."

"It enables us to implement software defined solutions very easily, because Apollo servers are certified for use with Linux systems"

"The cost benefit of this solution is most valuable. It is quite effective for the work for which we are using it. We are mainly running video servers on these, and we are quite happy with the resilience, density storage, and streaming capacity of the system."

"It's pretty flexible. You can choose how much storage you put on the server. You can have one to three nodes, depending on whether you want more CPU or storage."

"HPE Apollo's support is the most valuable feature."

"When we moved to the Apollo and all flash drives, we gained a lot of performance."

"The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience."

More HPE Apollo Systems pros

Cons

"The solution needs more capacity and more scalability."

"Definitely the support area needs improving. Especially the time response in case of hardware failure."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The C-Series is not designed to be as scalable. They are designed to have enough RAM and enough CPU on their own side. If you want scalability, it's better to choose the B-Series— the Blade Servers — because those are much more scalable with Fabric Interconnect."

"The product's stability and delivery time could be better."

"The initial setup could be easier."

"The warranty and support periods should be extended."

"In the version we need to use, the manager is still reliant on a full Java install on a Windows OS. This is inconvenient and problematic if you have multiple management tools on different versions of Java or if you move to a machine without the appropriate Java environment."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers cons

"If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo."

"We would like to see SimpliVity on top of the Apollo."

"We would like to see improved cooling because that is quite an issue. If you put that much compute power into a single rack, cooling really becomes an issue. And there is room for improvement there."

"HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved."

"We could, perhaps, use more GPUs in the future, go from eight to 16 GPUs per instance. That could run head-to-head against the DGX-1, the DGX-2 that NVIDIA has developed in their own chassis. That would be interesting to see."

"There is a shared battery for all cache controllers in the node. When you have to replace that element, you have to take down all three nodes and not just one."

"We are quite happy with it, but its price and storage density can be better."

"I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding."

More HPE Apollo Systems cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have to pay for the VMware and Cisco licenses."

"My company has an agreement with Cisco to get discounted rates. It is one of the reasons why we chose the product."

"This solution is a little expensive."

"The price of the Cisco UCS C-Series Rack could improve. It's a little more expensive in comparison with Dell or HPE solutions."

"The prices of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers are higher compared to the competition. When we try and sell against the competition, then it becomes quite difficult to sell"

"The solution is moderately priced."

"This product is slightly more expensive when compared to others."

"The price of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is approximately 20 percent more than other solutions."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."

"Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."

"It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."

"There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."

"Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Density Optimized Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

The C-series is the most valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

The solution is moderately priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

The improvement should be done as per customer requirements.

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE Apollo?

HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Apollo?

HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved. The solution should provide fast delivery when it comes to replacing a particular product that is under warranty.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Apollo?

We use HPE Apollo for specific requirements of Linux servers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 57% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 24% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Power Systems vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 2% of the time

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Competitors

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 35% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 21% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 7% of the time

More HPE Apollo Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

March 2025

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems

March 2025

Download HPE Apollo Systems product report

Also Known As

Unified Computing System C-Series, Cisco UCS C-Series

HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo

Overview

UCS C-Series Rack Servers deliver unified computing in an industry-standard form factor to reduce TCO and increase agility. Each server addresses varying workload challenges through a balance of processing, memory, I/O, and internal storage resources.

Cisco

The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Artoni Transporti, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, City of Mississauga, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Kind en Gezin, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Nationwide, Quest, Talbots, University of St. Gallen

Weta Digital

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems

February 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems report.

See our list of best Density Optimized Servers vendors and best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Density Optimized Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.