Top 10 Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco

4.2 out of 5

29 reviews
95% willing to recommend

1,286 followers

Top Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE ProLiant DL Servers, and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers provide scalability and ease of upgrades with robust management tools, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Cisco UCS C-Series excels in integration and virtualization, drawing buyers valuing network options despite potentially higher costs.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers Report

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers have a lower setup cost and offer straightforward installation, while Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers may involve higher initial expenses due to complex setup requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

4.3 out of 5

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

4.3 out of 5

HPE ProLiant DL Servers are chosen for cost-effective expandability and reliable management with integrated iLO. In comparison, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer advanced networking and virtualization features ideal for database applications, despite their higher cost.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE ProLiant DL Servers Report

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer a competitive setup cost while Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers tend to have a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer a competitive setup cost while Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers tend to have a higher initial investment.

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers offer scalability and customization for diverse business needs. In comparison, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers provide advanced management tools and performance efficiency. Lenovo is noted for cost-effectiveness, while Cisco justifies higher costs with superior long-term ROI and support.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers Report

Pricing

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers offer a budget-friendly installation compared to the Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, which have higher setup costs. This price difference highlights a clear distinction in initial investment requirements for both options.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Power Systems

4.4 out of 5

IBM Power Systems

4.4 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers excel in cost efficiency, offering customization and flexibility with simpler installation. In comparison, IBM Power Systems attract those seeking superior performance, scalability, and reliability, despite higher costs and complex deployment, appealing to users needing substantial processing power.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive setup costs, while IBM Power Systems may have higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Cisco.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive setup costs, while IBM Power Systems may have higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Cisco.

HPE Apollo Systems

4.2 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers attract buyers with their competitive pricing and smooth deployment, supported by reliable customer service. In comparison, HPE Apollo Systems cater to those needing high-density computing and energy efficiency, justifying their higher cost for data-intensive applications.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer lower setup costs compared to HPE Apollo Systems, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment. However, HPE Apollo Systems justify their higher setup cost with advanced features and scalability options.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle SPARC Servers

4.1 out of 5

Oracle SPARC Servers

4.1 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series offers scalability and integration for performance flexibility, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Oracle SPARC provides superior processing power and unmatched security features for those prioritizing security. Cisco UCS ensures easier deployment, while Oracle SPARC focuses on advanced features for long-term ROI.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which require a more substantial initial investment. This price difference highlights cost efficiency as a key consideration when choosing between these server options.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

4.2 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer reliability and performance consistency making them ideal for ease of integration. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge XE Servers integrate advanced technology with flexibility, appealing to businesses seeking innovation despite a higher initial cost and increased setup complexity.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have lower setup costs, making them budget-friendly compared to Dell PowerEdge XE Servers, which are pricier but offer robust performance features.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have lower setup costs, making them budget-friendly compared to Dell PowerEdge XE Servers, which are pricier but offer robust performance features.

HPE Moonshot

3.8 out of 5

HPE Moonshot

3.8 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer robust hardware for enterprises needing traditional computing power. In comparison, HPE Moonshot provides energy-efficient modules for specific workloads. Cisco UCS appeals with cost effectiveness and easy deployment, while HPE Moonshot delivers long-term energy savings and workload optimization.

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to HPE Moonshot, offering a more budget-friendly initial investment in infrastructure. In contrast, HPE Moonshot presents higher initial expenses, potentially reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell XR2 Rugged Server

4.5 out of 5

Dell XR2 Rugged Server

4.5 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series excels in virtualization and integration for data-heavy environments. In comparison, Dell XR2's rugged design suits harsh conditions. Cisco offers scalability, while Dell provides environmental resilience. Tech buyers choose Cisco for virtualization or Dell for durability and adaptability.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell XR2 Rugged Server Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower initial setup cost, while Dell XR2 Rugged Server has higher setup expenses. This distinction is crucial when considering the budget for these server solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Rack Servers

Density Optimized Servers

Converged Infrastructure