Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo

Top 10 Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco
4.2 out of 5
1,284 followers
Post review

Top Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE ProLiant DL Servers, and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers
4.5 out of 5
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers offer competitive pricing and responsive customer service, making them ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, while more expensive, provide superior integrated system management and scalability, justifying the initial investment with advanced features and long-term benefits.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers Report
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are noted for their lower initial setup costs whereas Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers present higher upfront expenses but include advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are noted for their lower initial setup costs whereas Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers present higher upfront expenses but include advanced features.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
HPE ProLiant DL Servers
4.3 out of 5
HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer reliability, scalability, and management tools. In comparison, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers provide performance, integrated security, and virtualization support. HPE is known for a simple deployment and robust support, while Cisco delivers advanced features and strong long-term ROI.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE ProLiant DL Servers Report
HPE ProLiant DL Servers have lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, making them more budget-friendly for initial deployments. Conversely, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers' higher setup costs could justify the advanced features they offer.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE ProLiant DL Servers have lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, making them more budget-friendly for initial deployments. Conversely, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers' higher setup costs could justify the advanced features they offer.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers
4.2 out of 5
Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers offer scalability and customization for diverse business needs. In comparison, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers provide advanced management tools and performance efficiency. Lenovo is noted for cost-effectiveness, while Cisco justifies higher costs with superior long-term ROI and support.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers Report
Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers offer a budget-friendly installation compared to the Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, which have higher setup costs. This price difference highlights a clear distinction in initial investment requirements for both options.
View comparison
Pricing
Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers offer a budget-friendly installation compared to the Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, which have higher setup costs. This price difference highlights a clear distinction in initial investment requirements for both options.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
IBM Power Systems
4.4 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
IBM Power Systems
4.4 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers excel in cost efficiency, offering customization and flexibility with simpler installation. In comparison, IBM Power Systems attract those seeking superior performance, scalability, and reliability, despite higher costs and complex deployment, appealing to users needing substantial processing power.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. IBM Power Systems Report
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive setup costs, while IBM Power Systems may have higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Cisco.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive setup costs, while IBM Power Systems may have higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Cisco.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
HPE Apollo Systems
4.2 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
HPE Apollo Systems
4.2 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers attract buyers with their competitive pricing and smooth deployment, supported by reliable customer service. In comparison, HPE Apollo Systems cater to those needing high-density computing and energy efficiency, justifying their higher cost for data-intensive applications.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer lower setup costs compared to HPE Apollo Systems, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment. However, HPE Apollo Systems justify their higher setup cost with advanced features and scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer lower setup costs compared to HPE Apollo Systems, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment. However, HPE Apollo Systems justify their higher setup cost with advanced features and scalability options.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Oracle SPARC Servers
4.1 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series offers scalability and integration for performance flexibility, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Oracle SPARC provides superior processing power and unmatched security features for those prioritizing security. Cisco UCS ensures easier deployment, while Oracle SPARC focuses on advanced features for long-term ROI.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which require a more substantial initial investment. This price difference highlights cost efficiency as a key consideration when choosing between these server options.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to Oracle SPARC Servers, which require a more substantial initial investment. This price difference highlights cost efficiency as a key consideration when choosing between these server options.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Dell PowerEdge XE Servers
4.2 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer reliability and performance consistency making them ideal for ease of integration. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge XE Servers integrate advanced technology with flexibility, appealing to businesses seeking innovation despite a higher initial cost and increased setup complexity.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Report
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have lower setup costs, making them budget-friendly compared to Dell PowerEdge XE Servers, which are pricier but offer robust performance features.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have lower setup costs, making them budget-friendly compared to Dell PowerEdge XE Servers, which are pricier but offer robust performance features.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
HPE Moonshot
3.8 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
HPE Moonshot
3.8 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer robust hardware for enterprises needing traditional computing power. In comparison, HPE Moonshot provides energy-efficient modules for specific workloads. Cisco UCS appeals with cost effectiveness and easy deployment, while HPE Moonshot delivers long-term energy savings and workload optimization.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to HPE Moonshot, offering a more budget-friendly initial investment in infrastructure. In contrast, HPE Moonshot presents higher initial expenses, potentially reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower setup cost compared to HPE Moonshot, offering a more budget-friendly initial investment in infrastructure. In contrast, HPE Moonshot presents higher initial expenses, potentially reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability.
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Logo
Dell XR2 Rugged Server
4.5 out of 5
Cisco UCS C-Series excels in virtualization and integration for data-heavy environments. In comparison, Dell XR2's rugged design suits harsh conditions. Cisco offers scalability, while Dell provides environmental resilience. Tech buyers choose Cisco for virtualization or Dell for durability and adaptability.
Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell XR2 Rugged Server Report
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower initial setup cost, while Dell XR2 Rugged Server has higher setup expenses. This distinction is crucial when considering the budget for these server solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have a lower initial setup cost, while Dell XR2 Rugged Server has higher setup expenses. This distinction is crucial when considering the budget for these server solutions.

Related categories

Rack Servers
Density Optimized Servers
Converged Infrastructure