Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers comparison

Cisco and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6, while Dell Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 4.5% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Dell Technologies’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

Read 29 Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers reviews

3,444 Views
2,009 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Read 10 Dell PowerEdge XE Servers reviews

652 Views
381 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and Dell PowerEdge XE Servers compete in the server market. Dell PowerEdge XE often has the upper hand due to its enhanced processing speed and hardware capabilities, making it more suitable for high-demand applications.

Features: Cisco UCS C-Series provides significant flexibility and scalability, enabling seamless adaptation in various environments. Integrated management simplifies administrative tasks. Cisco supports diverse infrastructures effectively. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers offer robust performance, especially for compute-heavy tasks, have extensive storage options, and are noted for high reliability.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS users see a need for better software updates, compatibility with third-party components, and customer support enhancements. Dell PowerEdge XE users suggest improvements in cooling systems, noise levels, and user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco users find integration easy due to detailed documentation, but report long wait times for customer support. Dell PowerEdge servers offer straightforward deployment with responsive and timely customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS users perceive higher setup costs with reliable ROI due to steady performance. Dell PowerEdge users justify initial expenses with long-term benefits and feature advantages, finding the pricing more attractive due to its cost-efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

Ranking in Rack Servers

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Density Optimized Servers (3rd)

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is 4.5%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Ehsan Emad

Head of IT at Synnapex

The VIC card is the most important feature.

I rate Cisco USC C-Series Rack Servers 10 out 10. If you plan to buy a C-Series, you should be clear about why you want to use it because the uses vary. different. Whether you're using Cisco, HPE, Dell or any other brand, it's essential to define your use case. For example, are you using it for a simulation graphics, calculations, etc.? Depending on the use case, you might want to go with a small server with more CPU. Sometimes you need a light CPU with a powerful GPU. For example, if we have a C-Series with four CPUs at the same time, or we have a server that's handled two CPUs at the same time—the purpose is crucial. C-Series is good enough compared to other competitors like HPE and the other ones. The HPE C20 is one unit and has a lot of RAM support, but the C-series is number one, in my opinion.

Read full review

Muzammil Nasim

Software Architect at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

We're hardly using 15 percent of their computing power, so there's a lot left over that we could utilize

It should be easier to extend PowerEdge XE servers. We haven't architected them with an eye toward scalability. They have a fixed number of slots for hard drives, which is enough for our present use case, However, we would have more options if we could extend that. We could deploy the servers in a broader range of use cases with different requirements. It's fine for our current deployment with only a few thousand users. We're exploring other solutions like such as VxRail or PowerFlex for larger public-facing use cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very stable and easy to use. It integrates easily with Cisco's cloud-based UC solutions. There are tools for management that make the management a bit easier, but we don't use them. We don't use what you would term as power users."

"We have many people in my organization using Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers in the administration."

"The initial setup is straightforward and easy to do."

"The C-series is the most valuable."

"Excellent server solution with incredible network throughput."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is performance."

"On the Cisco side, there is a benefit in terms of server management. Cisco provides UCS Manager, which is a multi-tenant site manager. We can manage multiple sites while maintaining disaster recovery, a feature not available on other platforms."

"The hardware customization capabilities are great."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers pros

"Its reliability and consistency are most valuable."

"The resource management features are valuable."

"The most valuable feature is that it can support up to 32 drives of internal storage."

"The strong point of this solution is its compatibility with VMware and its resilience."

"The most valuable feature of these servers is the ability to store a lot—the capacity and the number of hard disk drives."

"In general, it works well. We haven't had issues."

"PowerEdge XE servers are high-performing. We're hardly using 15 percent of their computing power, so there's a lot left over that we could utilize."

"The solution is flexible in my experience."

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers pros

Cons

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where Cisco needs to focus on making some improvements."

"The hard drive of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is not very good. I have already replaced three of them."

"The price of the solution is problematic, not the solution itself. It could be less expensive."

"There is very little scalability for the cluster. If you need a higher availability, there is a user limitation. So that is the low side."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Some customers have complained about delivery time. So, the main weakness is the lead time."

"Cisco UCS C-Series Rack could improve by selling storage. Cisco doesn't sell storage, which is a problem because some customers ask for storage. There are several brands in the market, such as HPE, and Dell EMC. However, Cisco doesn't have any storage. This is where the tension comes from buying this solution."

"The product's stability and delivery time could be better."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers cons

"I would like to have support for performing a detailed analysis of the server from a mobile device."

"Dell PowerEdge XE Servers can improve by adapting HCI technology."

"It should be easier to extend PowerEdge XE servers. We haven't architected them with an eye toward scalability. They have a fixed number of slots for hard drives, which is enough for our present use case, However, we would have more options if we could extend that. We could deploy the servers in a broader range of use cases with different requirements. It's fine for our current deployment with only a few thousand users. We're exploring other solutions like such as VxRail or PowerFlex for larger public-facing use cases."

"Upgrading can be a bit difficult."

"We use OpenManager a lot, and that can be a bit clunky at times. They can make that better."

"The support team must improve the speed of response."

"The quality and reliability could be improved."

"It is mostly stable, but the usual problem would be, for example, upgrading to a newer version of VMware or dealing with compatibility issues during the process."

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is a little expensive."

"The price of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is high."

"This product is slightly more expensive when compared to others."

"The price of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is approximately 20 percent more than other solutions."

"The price for Cisco is a bit higher than its competitors. We paid 40k for one server."

"The solution could be more cost-effective."

"If they plan to expand their infrastructure in periods, then simply Cisco is not a good choice."

"Cisco is expensive, but we didn't look at the cost of the product. We were looking at reliability and support."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers pricing and cost advice

"This solution is priced very reasonably."

"Dell has competitive pricing."

"The pricing model is quite competitive."

"If you want an SLA for parts and equipment then you need to purchase a support agreement."

"There are different types of licensing available, that works well for customers. The product is not very much to purchase."

"You always want slightly cheaper, but overall, they are quite comparable and quite neutral."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

The C-series is the most valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

The solution is moderately priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

The improvement should be done as per customer requirements.

See all answers

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge XE Servers?

The resource management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge XE Servers?

Dell has competitive pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge XE Servers?

The support team must improve the speed of response. The product should be promoted more in the market.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 56% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 25% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Power Systems vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Competitors

HPE Apollo Systems vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 54% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 26% of the time

Dell XR2 Rugged Server vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 20% of the time

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

February 2025

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

January 2025

Download Dell PowerEdge XE Servers product report

Also Known As

Unified Computing System C-Series, Cisco UCS C-Series

PowerEdge XE Servers

Overview

UCS C-Series Rack Servers deliver unified computing in an industry-standard form factor to reduce TCO and increase agility. Each server addresses varying workload challenges through a balance of processing, memory, I/O, and internal storage resources.

Cisco

Our newest addition to the Dell EMC PowerEdge family, PowerEdge XE servers are purpose-built for complex, harsh and compute-intensive workloads.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Artoni Transporti, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, City of Mississauga, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Kind en Gezin, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Nationwide, Quest, Talbots, University of St. Gallen

Epsilon, ROZETTA CORP, JIGUANG, RACKSPACE, NEW BELGIUM BREWING

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

January 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.