Digital.ai Application Security vs HCL AppScan comparison

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

"There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base."

"It provides a better integration for our ecosystem."

"We use it as a security testing application."

"It identifies all the URLs and domains on its own and then performs tests and provides the results."

"Compared to other tools only AppScan supports special language."

"For me, as a manager, it was the ease of use. Inserting security into the development process is not normally an easy project to do. The ability for the developer to actually use it and get results and focuses, that's what counted."

"We leverage it as a quality check against code."

"The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing."

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

"The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."

"The tool should improve its output. Scanning is not a challenge anymore since there are many such tools available in the market. The product needs to focus on how its output is being used by end users. It should be also more user-friendly. One of the major challenges is in the tool's integration with applications that need to be scanned. Sometimes, the scanning is not proper."

"Improvement can be done as per customer requirements."

"In future releases, I would like to see more aggressive reports. I would also like to see less false positives."

"Scans become slow on large websites."

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future."

"​IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use​."

"I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"The price is very expensive."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."