DigitalOcean and Google Firebase are competing products in the cloud computing space. Google Firebase appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, while DigitalOcean is favored for its straightforward pricing model.
Features: DigitalOcean offers virtual servers, scalable cloud computing options, and straightforward deployment capabilities. Google Firebase provides integrated services like database management, analytics, and machine learning, which make it well-suited for application development. Firebase's feature set gives it an advantage for developers seeking all-in-one solutions.
Room for Improvement: DigitalOcean could enhance its feature set to better compete with integrated services platforms. Additionally, improved scalability options and expanded service offerings could attract more users. Google Firebase could streamline its pricing structure for greater simplicity. Enhance user interface flexibility and improve offline capabilities for a more adaptable platform.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DigitalOcean is known for simplicity and ease of use with extensive documentation and strong support. Firebase, while complex due to its feature depth, offers substantial resources and support for engaging its ecosystem. DigitalOcean appeals to those seeking simplicity, and Firebase, to those looking for flexibility and integrated services.
Pricing and ROI: DigitalOcean's transparent and competitive pricing model offers predictable costs suitable for smaller projects. Firebase's potentially complex pricing due to integrated services provides value for scalable solutions. The choice often depends on budget and project scale, with DigitalOcean being ideal for cost-conscious projects and Firebase providing better ROI for growth-focused projects.
DigitalOcean support is rated lower than AWS's because we encounter issues more frequently.
I do not currently find any other competitors that match its offering.
If the community doesn't have the answers, then I contact the Google Firebase team directly.
I have not tried vertical scaling yet, but from the documentation, it seems very easy to scale the system.
It can handle all tiers of the market effectively.
Google also has some other cloud services, but when we compare Google Firebase, it is not as scalable.
I would rate the scalability of Google Firebase as eight because I miss some features from MS SQL, particularly the SQL functions.
DigitalOcean is quite stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.
It is approximately 50 to 60% stable, reaching 60 to 70% depending on usage levels.
In our company, we have prototypes on Google Firebase and productions on AWS Cloud.
DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments.
The lack of a proper service provider model ultimately led us to cease operations with DigitalOcean.
There are issues where even with 8 GB RAM, the performance doesn't meet expectations.
Automation testing with mobile devices could be improved, especially in regression testing to ensure that new feature launches do not affect other features.
Since Google Firebase is a NoSQL platform, areas for improvement include enhancing query functionalities to be more equivalent to SQL, like MS SQL.
DigitalOcean offers affordable pricing, especially for startups.
They could have implemented credits based on usage so that users would be able to easily calculate the pricing and provide it to customers.
Google Firebase offers a reasonable pricing structure.
The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well.
The most significant aspect is that we can connect directly to the system from anywhere.
The team was particularly satisfied with the flexibility of the service and the rules for managing virtual machines on DigitalOcean.
It allows for pre-launch testing without publishing it on Google Play right away.
What I appreciate most about Google Firebase is the speed, accuracy, and security it offers.
Serverless cloud functions.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Firebase | 2.6% |
| DigitalOcean | 2.0% |
| Other | 95.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Google Firebase is a stable, reliable, and scalable mobile platform that enables you to quickly develop apps, accelerate them, and monitor their performance.
With Google Firebase You Can
Google Firebase Features:
SDKs supported by Google Firebase:
Benefits of Google Firebase:
Reviews from Real Users
PeerSpot user Nilakshi S., technical team lead at AuthentiCode says, “The solution is very stable and very reliable. There aren't any bugs or glitches.”
"What I like most about Google Firebase is that it's one of the easier options to host a website or app quickly," says Craig F., application development manager at a financial services firm.
A senior developer at a consultancy says, “The documentation for Google Firebase is great. Also, what I like about it is the integration to Android, which is the reason I went with Firebase.”
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
