Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dragos vs SCADAfence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dragos
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SCADAfence
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Dragos is 11.5%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCADAfence is 2.9%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

ML
Centralized management and cybersecurity features enhance IoT device oversight
Dragos ( /products/dragos-reviews ) offers several valuable features, including the capability to manage IoT devices on a centralized platform. It allows for updates to devices and uniform management counsel, enabling updates to all devices. Another key feature is its ability to manage cybersecurity aspects of devices, such as updating or isolating devices found to have vulnerabilities. It includes features for automatic discovery of devices and inventory management of devices, and it facilitates incident response by allowing for isolation or shutdown of devices in case of critical vulnerabilities.
reviewer2352084 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to integrate, enhances operational efficiency, and has machine learning capabilities
We are satisfied with the product. We can passively scan the network for anomalies and let it learn through machine learning about the normal state of the network. If it deviates from that, then it is an anomaly. It would give an alert about anomalous behaviors like a cyber attack. The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency. It is easy to integrate the solution with the existing industrial control systems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment."
"The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency."
 

Cons

"Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area."
"The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Construction Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Mining And Metals Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SCADAfence?
The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency.
What needs improvement with SCADAfence?
The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow.
What is your primary use case for SCADAfence?
The solution is used for securing factories.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Dragos Platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NaturEner
Siemens, ABB, Schneider Electric, Mitsubishi, General Electric, Honeywell
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.