Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SCADAfence vs Tenable OT Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SCADAfence
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tenable OT Security
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of SCADAfence is 3.0%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable OT Security is 13.1%, up from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2352084 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to integrate, enhances operational efficiency, and has machine learning capabilities
We are satisfied with the product. We can passively scan the network for anomalies and let it learn through machine learning about the normal state of the network. If it deviates from that, then it is an anomaly. It would give an alert about anomalous behaviors like a cyber attack. The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency. It is easy to integrate the solution with the existing industrial control systems.
AnandKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps identify vulnerabilities and risks for IT and OT assets
Tenable OT Security is fine, but I find it more language-based rather than structured. It feels like something is on a web page, and the dashboards and data representations are not cool. First of all, I said that the tool view should be improved. It looks pretty old. Second, the details Tenable OT Security provides regarding the metadata they work with should be more in-depth. Its main focus is vulnerability management, which is fine, but what about threat actors? What about attack vectors and OT vulnerabilities? There are major areas, baselines, etc. that need attention.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency."
"The active query inventory is the most valuable feature."
"The product has easy-to-manage features and components."
"The product’s price is its most valuable feature."
"I like Tenable OT Security for two main reasons. Firstly, it helps identify vulnerabilities and risks for IT and OT assets, which is crucial for our operations. Secondly, it performs external port scanning, including vulnerability scans for open ports. Compared to the Claroty Platform, the tool offers detailed asset discovery capabilities."
"It's for securing the vulnerability of the OT solutions they are using. We mitigate those through patch management activities and find vulnerabilities easily with this security solution."
 

Cons

"The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow."
"The solution should provide more features to prevent attacks."
"Tenable OT Security is fine, but I find it more language-based rather than structured. It feels like something is on a web page, and the dashboards and data representations are not cool. First of all, I said that the tool view should be improved. It looks pretty old. Second, the details Tenable OT Security provides regarding the metadata they work with should be more in-depth. Its main focus is vulnerability management, which is fine, but what about threat actors? What about attack vectors and OT vulnerabilities? There are major areas, baselines, etc. that need attention."
"Tenable.ot's integration with one of the products needs improvement."
"Tenable OT product is good, but OT security itself is still maturing."
"The solution could detect changes in reading variables. The support of IoT devices can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool's pricing is fair enough."
"The product is inexpensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Mining And Metals Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SCADAfence?
The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency.
What needs improvement with SCADAfence?
The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow.
What is your primary use case for SCADAfence?
The solution is used for securing factories.
What do you like most about Tenable OT Security?
The product’s price is its most valuable feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable OT Security?
It is affordable, but it depends on the number of assets. It costs around 50K.
What needs improvement with Tenable OT Security?
The solution could detect changes in reading variables. The support of IoT devices can be improved.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.ot
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Siemens, ABB, Schneider Electric, Mitsubishi, General Electric, Honeywell
Nesher Cement Enterprises, City of Raleigh
Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty, Nozomi, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.