Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DRBD vs Swarm64 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

DRBD
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Swarm64
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of DRBD is 13.4%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swarm64 is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

it_user302112 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's kept data synchronized between multiple nodes in different datacenters, though it should have its own filesystem which can be used in multi-master environments.
Working with DRBD can be complex and it takes time to understand how it works. Especially split-brain scenarios need to be handled carefully. When it comes to multi-master setups, which are possible with the latest DRBD version, you need to use a cluster filesystem. I think that DRBD should write their own filesystem which can be used in multi-master environments since most cluster filesystems are complex or simply have many flaws.
Use Swarm64?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Portland State University, Porsche Informatik, Siemens, Ericsson,T-Mobile, Addidas
Alliance Venture, Target Partners, Investinor
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veritas, IBM and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.