Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

E2E Bridge vs Mule ESB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

E2E Bridge
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (22nd)
Mule ESB
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. E2E Bridge is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Mule ESB, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), holds 25.2% mindshare, up 24.9% since last year.
Business-to-Business Middleware
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user651540 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 23, 2017
Allows for implementation of integration logic.
UML and integration work hand in hand. It allows for fast implementation of complex integration logic Integration will never be a challenging topic to discuss. The latest version of the product has improved tremendously. Maybe they need to support more connectivity protocols. I did not use the…
PurbayanSaha - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 9, 2024
Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs
We're using our Mule ESB mostly for integration projects for multinational companies that do business on a B2C or B2B basis. We also work with companies with multiple third-party vendors employed under their payroll. The Mule ESB helps integrate data from third-party systems or vendors with the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is expensive."
"This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
"I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."
"Regarding licensing and pricing, I find it somewhat flexible. They are more flexible with larger customers compared to small and medium ones, as their licensing model depends on ports and other factors. Large customers benefit from more flexibility in implementation and renewal compared to smaller ones."
"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."
"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agri Retail, dodenhof, PKZ, Nikon, Ypsomed, EVN, Landwirtschaftsverlag Mªnster, Intrum Justitia, UBS, B2BNet, Ammann, Antalis, Apareoo, Coutts, Franke, Swissgrid, UPC Cablecom, Vontobel
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.