Mule ESB vs Oracle Service Bus comparison

Salesforce and Oracle are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9, while Oracle is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5. Salesforce holds a 25.5% mindshare in E, compared to Oracle’s 12.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Mule ESB

Read 49 Mule ESB reviews

4,739 Views
3,944 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Oracle Service Bus

Read 29 Oracle Service Bus reviews

3,010 Views
2,006 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Mule ESB

Oracle Service Bus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Mule ESB is 25.5%, up from 24.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Service Bus is 12.8%, up from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

PurbayanSaha

Technology Consultant at Ernst & Young

Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs

There's room for improvement in multi-file transfer functionality. It's not convenient when using MuleSoft, and it should have better capability for handling large amounts of data. For example, applications like GoAnywhere can handle huge chunks of data, so the tool should also have something to facilitate that aspect of integration.

Read full review

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Allows seamless integration and connectivity with different types of systems

I would suggest using this solution. Oracle Service Bus is very good. Any organization can use it. So it's very robust and scalable, and its security features are very good. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because there are some loopholes in service and support. Sometimes, when we have issues and go to Oracle support, they will not give us solutions. Instead, they will ask for so many log files and emails. The product is good, but the support is not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy connectivity and easy integration."

"The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company."

"The API management capabilities are exemplary. You can apply security policies to most applications, monitor logs, and get analytical data on request reception, response generation time, associated APIs, endpoints, and inbound and outbound messages."

"Mule Expression Language"

"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."

"For complex cases, we employ the SSLi engine, whereas for simpler ones like healthcare or response data, such as EDI 270 or 271. We prefer to use an external XRT engine instead of handling it within the ESB for ease of management."

"The setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."

More Mule ESB pros

"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."

"Overall it is a pretty good solution."

"The flexibility offered by Oracle Service Bus, especially in the latest versions, includes abstracting underlying processes and enabling drag-and-drop mappings from source to destination."

"The ability to master the process in one location."

"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."

"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."

"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."

More Oracle Service Bus pros

Cons

"The stability could be improved."

"In India, particularly in the banking sector, clients do not prefer cloud solutions due to regulatory and compliance requirements."

"It should have some amount of logging."

"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."

"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."

"Lacking some connectors that could be included."

"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."

"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."

More Mule ESB cons

"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."

"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."

"While I have not used the latest versions, resource efficiency could be optimized, considering past experiences"

"The consolidation functionality is minimal, lacking advanced features for complex integrations."

"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."

"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."

"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."

"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."

More Oracle Service Bus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."

"I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."

"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."

"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."

"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."

"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."

"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."

"The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version."

More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice

"This is a very expensive product and the price varies depending on factors such as the number of processors and the number of users. Our licensing fees are approximately $300,000."

"I'm not aware of how much Oracle Service Bus costs."

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."

"We have an unlimited yearly license."

"Oracle Service Bus is a bit expensive"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company

I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...

See all answers

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?

Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mule ESB?

The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Service Bus?

The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Service Bus?

Integration was expensive around ten to fifteen years ago due to the need for highly specialized staff, not easily affordable for normal people.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Service Bus?

The consolidation functionality is minimal, lacking advanced features for complex integrations. This includes eliminating internal company transactions for financial reporting, which currently take...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 32% of the time

webMethods.io vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB

Compared 6% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Mule ESB

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB

Compared 6% of the time

More Mule ESB Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 23% of the time

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 9% of the time

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Service Bus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB

January 2025

Download Mule ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Service Bus

January 2025

Download Oracle Service Bus product report

Learn More

Salesforce

Oracle

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot

MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus

January 2025

Free Report: Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus

Find out what your peers are saying about Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.