Oracle Service Bus vs Red Hat Fuse comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Oracle is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6, while Red Hat is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7. Oracle holds a 12.5% mindshare in E, compared to Red Hat’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Oracle Service Bus

Read 28 Oracle Service Bus reviews

3,266 Views
2,223 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Red Hat Fuse

Read 23 Red Hat Fuse reviews

3,454 Views
1,716 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Service Bus

Red Hat Fuse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Fuse

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Oracle Service Bus is 12.5%, up from 12.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Fuse is 8.8%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Jun 2, 2023

Allows seamless integration and connectivity with different types of systems

We are using Oracle Service Bus to connect multiple applications with multiple environments. So it's like we are connecting ServiceNow to Salesforce and ServiceNow to a legacy system With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the…

Read full review

Kaushal Kedia

Technical Manager at HCL Technologies

May 26, 2022

Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement

What needs to be improved in Red Hat Fuse is on the development side because when you use it for development purposes, it lacks a user interface compared to what MuleSoft has, so it's a bit difficult for users. There are good and bad points in Red Hat Fuse, but mostly the solution has good points. There's also another similar product in the market: IB Information Builder which is a product that has recently been taken over by TIBCO, and TIBCO has a similar integration product. It's similar to MuleSoft because both TIBCO and MuleSoft have user interfaces on the development side, so if I have to define a route where one particular flow should follow a particular way, for example, service should be consumed from this point, and these are my source and target, I'd be able to do those on MuleSoft and TIBCO more easily, but not in Red Hat Fuse. The development features of Red Hat Fuse need improvement, but I feel the team has done a lot in the latest version, and now Red Hat Fuse will be removed from the market and the focus will be on OpenShift purely. There is also a new product called Red Hat Integration and there will be a movement towards Docker because a major drawback of Red Hat Fuse is that it doesn't have small containers, so every time, you'll need dedicated virtual machines on top of those you're running, but now, it seems Kubernetes will be used. In the past, in the older version of Red Hat Fuse, you have a full container and the whole application is deployed on containers one, two, and three, so you don't have the option of splitting. It's similar to microservices, but now those things are taken care of in the latest version, and the older version of Red Hat Fuse will come to an end. An additional feature I'd like to see in Red Hat Fuse is a direct integration, particularly with CI/CD, which can help reduce overhead because you won't need to have a big DevOps team for building, preparation, and deployment. Dockers and microservices support are also additional features I'd like to see in the solution. More successful deployments will also help make Red Hat Fuse better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."

"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."

"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."

"It is stable."

"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."

"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."

"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."

"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."

More Oracle Service Bus pros

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. We are an enterprise business."

"The most valuable part of Fuse is the fact that it's based on Red Hat Apache Camel. It is really good that it already comes with so many different connectors. That makes it relatively easy to use. We use their XML definition to define the routes, making it really easy to define the routing."

"The solution has more tooling and options."

"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."

"The stability has been good."

"The features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse are the OSB framework, containerization, and the integration of Apache technologies such as the NQ channel, CXF, etc. These are the features that are very prominent in the solution. Red Hat Fuse also offers flexibility, so it's another valuable characteristic of the solution."

"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."

"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."

More Red Hat Fuse pros

Cons

"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."

"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."

"Security needs to be more integrated."

"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."

"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."

"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."

"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."

"The error-handling capability can be improved"

More Oracle Service Bus cons

"For improvement, they can consider the way we collaborate with other applications...Right now, in Red Hat Fuse, everything is not available under one umbrella."

"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."

"The web tools need to be updated."

"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."

"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."

"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."

"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."

"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."

More Red Hat Fuse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"We have an unlimited yearly license."

"Oracle Service Bus is a bit expensive"

"I'm not aware of how much Oracle Service Bus costs."

"This is a very expensive product and the price varies depending on factors such as the number of processors and the number of users. Our licensing fees are approximately $300,000."

"My company pays for the license of Red Hat Fuse yearly. At the end of the day, it's a low-cost solution, and its support licenses are still very decently priced versus bigger operators such as IBM, etc. Red Hat Fuse is much more affordable than other solutions. On a scale of one to five, with one being cheap and five being extremely expensive, I'm rating its pricing a one."

"Our license for Red Hat Fuse is around $27,000 per year, which is very expensive."

"Pricing has been something that we have been working with Red Hat on, year over year. We have preferred pricing with the university because we are involved in education and research."

"The most important feature of Fuse is the cost. It is open source and a cheap option for an ESB. So, most of the clients in the Middle East and Asian countries prefer this ESB. Other ESBs, like MuleSoft and IBM API Connect, are pretty expensive. Because it is open source, Red Hat Fuse is the cheapest solution, providing almost every integration capability."

"The solution doesn't have independent licensing."

"After doing some Googling and comparisons, the main standouts were MuleSoft and Red Hat Fuse. One of the big factors in our decision to go with Fuse was the licensing cost. It was cheaper to go with Fuse."

"We found other solutions were more costly."

"You need to pay for the license. It's not free."

More Red Hat Fuse pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Service Bus?

The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Service Bus?

Pricing depends on the use case.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Service Bus?

The error handling capability can be improved, but the present capacity just meets the requirements. The error should be properly displayed in Oracle Service Bus instead of the user's need to searc...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Fuse?

The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Fuse?

You need to pay for the license. It's not free. I'm not aware of the exact prices. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing since it is a subscription-based solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Fuse?

I haven't experienced the online part of Red Hat Fuse. Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications. Using administrative control, the operational user can view...

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 21% of the time

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 10% of the time

webMethods.io vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 10% of the time

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs Oracle Service Bus

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Service Bus Competitors

Mule ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 28% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 20% of the time

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 8% of the time

JBoss ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Fuse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Service Bus

October 2024

Download Oracle Service Bus product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse

October 2024

Download Red Hat Fuse product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fuse ESB, FuseSource

Learn More

Oracle

Red Hat

Overview

Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Sample Customers

MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP

Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse

October 2024

Free Report: Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.