Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Red Hat and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Red Hat holds a 5.9% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Red Hat Fuse

Read 26 Red Hat Fuse reviews

1,602 Views
1,506 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

3,072 Views
983 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Red Hat Fuse

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Red Hat Fuse and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator compete in the integration and API management category. Red Hat Fuse appears stronger in developer-friendliness and seamless connectivity, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator stands out in API management and mediation.

Features: Red Hat Fuse is known for its seamless integration capabilities, leveraging Apache Camel for connectivity. It offers modularity and containerization features that simplify deployment. An additional strength is its developer-friendly environment, enabling swift application development. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator excels in providing a robust API management platform with extensive transformation capabilities. Its wide range of adaptors makes it a versatile choice for standardizing processes. The solution also offers a no-code, user-friendly environment for faster integrations.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Fuse users suggest that documentation and user interface enhancements could further improve the experience. Smoother learning curves and better built-in connectors are also areas to consider. Users wish for improved monitoring and easier configurations. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator could improve its admin interface, ease of customization, and library maturity. Better pricing models and expanded connector support would enhance its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Fuse is mainly used in on-premises environments but is expanding its cloud capabilities. While its technical support is generally responsive, some users experience slower response times. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is praised for its easy setup and strong community support, although administrative complexities can occur. Both providers offer helpful technical support, although response time improvements would be beneficial.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Fuse is initially costly, with its high cost of ownership being suited to larger enterprises that can benefit from its robust support. While open source, the support costs can drive up the price, with ROI realized through operational cost reductions. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is generally more cost-effective, though open-source users might find subscription fees restrictive. Both solutions show ROI, albeit with varying initial investments and long-term savings potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,906 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Fuse

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Red Hat Fuse is 5.9%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 6.3%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Fuse	5.9%
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	6.3%
Other	87.8%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Nilay Rathod

Chapter Area Lead/GM Group Architecture & IT at Spark New Zealand

Microservices have transformed our integrations and now highlight room to improve AI-driven tooling

There are areas in Red Hat Fuse that have room for improvement. We were recently having a discussion with Red Hat team building agentic AI, which we call AI SDLC. Something that the team is actively working on, but I have not really seen any production-level version of it is MCP. For us to use Red Hat Fuse with AI models, we need MCP so that we can be very confident that it can deliver us a really solid outcome when developers are using it, whether it is any of the integration patterns or messaging bus patterns. I have not seen that yet. Even though Red Hat has an alternative to that, such as a plugin, it is not as advanced as some of the MCPs that we see around.

Read full review

Andrea Cuccarini

Technical director at Cremete

Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it's the same as Apache Camel."

"It was pretty effective in aligning the software."

"Any time we contact Red Hat for help we had got a satisficing response."

"Red Hat Fuse's best features are that it's very easy to set up and maintain."

"When comparing the database in Red Hat to that in Windows, we do prefer Red Hat based on its performance."

"I'm recommending Red Hat Fuse to others because it's affordable and it's built on top of technology that is pretty popular and well supported."

"What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive."

"I found it was quite easy to set up and implement."

More Red Hat Fuse pros

"The solution's customer service is good."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature; it is very easy to write remediations."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"The built-in connectors help with quick connectivity to the platforms, and we are using this for both our banking and insurance clients."

"WSO2 Enterprise Integrator may cost you about twenty-five thousand dollars annually per year compared to IBM Cloud Pak, which would cost you around one million dollars."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Some of the official Red Hat documentation could be improved a little bit. It was a little difficult to find exactly what I was looking for."

"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."

"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."

"What needs to be improved in Red Hat Fuse is on the development side because when you use it for development purposes, it lacks a user interface compared to what MuleSoft has, so it's a bit difficult for users."

"In the future, I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."

"My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive."

"What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy."

"Red Hat Fuse is very stable with Apache and Linux but not with Windows. We faced a lot of issues regarding the production setup with Windows - there are a lot of settings that need to be changed to avoid interactions between Fuse and Windows services that Fuse doesn't support."

More Red Hat Fuse cons

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"We had some challenges with the installation of this solution."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"The scalability is not strong. If you want to scale it you have to install multiple servers."

"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need to pay for the license. It's not free."

"Red Hat Fuse is an expensive tool, though I cannot answer how much it costs as that's confidential."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"My company pays for the license of Red Hat Fuse yearly. At the end of the day, it's a low-cost solution, and its support licenses are still very decently priced versus bigger operators such as IBM, etc. Red Hat Fuse is much more affordable than other solutions. On a scale of one to five, with one being cheap and five being extremely expensive, I'm rating its pricing a one."

"The most important feature of Fuse is the cost. It is open source and a cheap option for an ESB. So, most of the clients in the Middle East and Asian countries prefer this ESB. Other ESBs, like MuleSoft and IBM API Connect, are pretty expensive. Because it is open source, Red Hat Fuse is the cheapest solution, providing almost every integration capability."

"We are paying around $24 million across five years."

"This is an expensive product. It costs a lot and although it's worth the money, the explanations that we need to give to our top executives are highly complicated."

"We use the standard license, but you need the container platform in order to run it."

More Red Hat Fuse pricing and cost advice

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Fuse?

When considering pricing for Red Hat Fuse, this is a pretty interesting question. When you consider cost, it is not just the cost of the software, but also the cost of development, cost of usage, a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Fuse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Fuse?

Red Hat Fuse serves as our enterprise integration platform. We do use some of the message bus features as well, but it is not the enterprise message bus.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

A typical use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is when I am in an interoperability environment with healthcare facilities and I have to put together a lot of applications that share some HL7 mes...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 16% of the time

JBoss ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 7% of the time

FioranoMQ vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Fuse Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 3% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse

April 2026

Download Red Hat Fuse product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2026

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Also Known As

Fuse ESB, FuseSource

No data available

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Red Hat

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE

West

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2026

Free Report: Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.