Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."

"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."

"What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive."

"The stability has been good."

"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."

"The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."

"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."

"We use it because it is easy to integrate with any other application...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution nine out of ten."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"The solution's customer service is good."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"It was mostly easy to set up the product."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."

"For improvement, they can consider the way we collaborate with other applications...Right now, in Red Hat Fuse, everything is not available under one umbrella."

"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."

"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."

"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."

"Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."

"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."

"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"The solution doesn't have independent licensing."

"We found other solutions were more costly."

"Our license for Red Hat Fuse is around $27,000 per year, which is very expensive."

"You need to pay for the license. It's not free."

"In terms of pricing, Red Hat Fuse is a bit expensive because nowadays, if I'm just comparing it with OpenShift with Kubernetes, so Kubernetes and OpenShift, are similar, and Kubernetes is open source, so Red Hat Fuse is quite expensive in terms of support, but Red Hat Fuse provides value for money because it provides good support. If you want to get something, you need to pay for it."

"We are paying around $24 million across five years."

"My company pays for the license of Red Hat Fuse yearly. At the end of the day, it's a low-cost solution, and its support licenses are still very decently priced versus bigger operators such as IBM, etc. Red Hat Fuse is much more affordable than other solutions. On a scale of one to five, with one being cheap and five being extremely expensive, I'm rating its pricing a one."

"We use the standard license, but you need the container platform in order to run it."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."